PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPQB.DE vs. ZA30.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SPQB.DE vs. ZA30.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Global X S&P 500 Quarterly Buffer UCITS ETF (SPQB.DE) and iShares S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc (ZA30.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SPQB.DE vs. ZA30.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
SPQB.DE
Global X S&P 500 Quarterly Buffer UCITS ETF
0.81%-0.77%20.64%10.42%
ZA30.DE
iShares S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc
-2.86%5.34%31.19%17.90%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPQB.DE achieves a 0.81% return, which is significantly higher than ZA30.DE's -2.86% return.


SPQB.DE

1D
0.57%
1M
0.21%
YTD
0.81%
6M
3.88%
1Y
4.26%
3Y*
9.88%
5Y*
10Y*

ZA30.DE

1D
1.74%
1M
-3.48%
YTD
-2.86%
6M
1.74%
1Y
11.77%
3Y*
16.33%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SPQB.DE vs. ZA30.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPQB.DE has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than ZA30.DE's 0.07% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

SPQB.DE vs. ZA30.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPQB.DE
SPQB.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
SPQB.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPQB.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPQB.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
SPQB.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPQB.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

ZA30.DE
ZA30.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
ZA30.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZA30.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZA30.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
ZA30.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZA30.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPQB.DE vs. ZA30.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 Quarterly Buffer UCITS ETF (SPQB.DE) and iShares S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc (ZA30.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPQB.DEZA30.DEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.35

0.69

-0.33

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.54

1.01

-0.47

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.15

-0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.69

1.36

-0.66

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.54

5.35

-2.81

SPQB.DE vs. ZA30.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPQB.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.35, which is lower than the ZA30.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPQB.DE and ZA30.DE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPQB.DEZA30.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

0.69

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.99

0.93

+0.06

Correlation

The correlation between SPQB.DE and ZA30.DE is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

SPQB.DE vs. ZA30.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither SPQB.DE nor ZA30.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

SPQB.DE vs. ZA30.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPQB.DE drawdown since its inception was -16.15%, smaller than the maximum ZA30.DE drawdown of -23.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPQB.DE and ZA30.DE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SPQB.DEZA30.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.15%

-23.45%

+7.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.27%

-13.74%

+3.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.27%

-4.93%

+2.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.69%

-3.34%

+0.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.81%

2.22%

-0.41%

Volatility

SPQB.DE vs. ZA30.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X S&P 500 Quarterly Buffer UCITS ETF (SPQB.DE) is 2.07%, while iShares S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc (ZA30.DE) has a volatility of 3.75%. This indicates that SPQB.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZA30.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SPQB.DEZA30.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.07%

3.75%

-1.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.50%

8.38%

-2.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.07%

17.14%

-5.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.75%

14.55%

-4.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.75%

14.55%

-4.80%