SPPP vs. GDXW
SPPP (Sprott Physical Platinum and Palladium Trust) and GDXW (Roundhill Gold Miners Weeklypay ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPPP is a Precious Metals fund actively managed by Sprott, while GDXW is a Gold fund actively managed by Roundhill. Both are actively managed. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SPPP charges 1.02%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for GDXW.
Performance
SPPP vs. GDXW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPPP achieves a -14.37% return, which is significantly lower than GDXW's -4.89% return.
SPPP
- 1D
- -4.12%
- 1M
- -6.42%
- YTD
- -14.37%
- 6M
- -2.30%
- 1Y
- 39.19%
- 3Y*
- 5.59%
- 5Y*
- -6.33%
- 10Y*
- 8.53%
GDXW
- 1D
- -4.02%
- 1M
- -1.27%
- YTD
- -4.89%
- 6M
- 2.36%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPPP vs. GDXW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SPPP Sprott Physical Platinum and Palladium Trust | -14.37% | 17.68% |
GDXW Roundhill Gold Miners Weeklypay ETF | -4.89% | 21.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPPP and GDXW is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2025 | 0.75 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPPP vs. GDXW — Risk / Return Rank
SPPP
GDXW
SPPP vs. GDXW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Physical Platinum and Palladium Trust (SPPP) and Roundhill Gold Miners Weeklypay ETF (GDXW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPPP | GDXW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.05 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.23 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPPP | GDXW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.18 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.09 | 0.45 | -0.36 |
Drawdowns
SPPP vs. GDXW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPPP drawdown since its inception was -59.09%, which is greater than GDXW's maximum drawdown of -36.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPPP and GDXW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPPP | GDXW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.09% | -36.83% | -22.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -37.42% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -37.42% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -58.50% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.09% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -36.14% | -32.99% | -3.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.48% | -13.45% | -13.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.60% | — | — |
Volatility
SPPP vs. GDXW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPPP | GDXW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.71% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 45.53% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.97% | 61.39% | -10.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.89% | 61.39% | -26.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.10% | 61.39% | -28.29% |
SPPP vs. GDXW - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPPP has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is higher than GDXW's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPPP vs. GDXW - Dividend Comparison
SPPP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GDXW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 39.39%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
GDXW Roundhill Gold Miners Weeklypay ETF | 39.39% | 7.48% |
SPPP Sprott Physical Platinum and Palladium Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPPP and GDXW have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GDXW is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GDXW is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.02% for SPPP.
GDXW has the higher dividend yield at 39.39%, compared with 0.00% for SPPP.
SPPP is categorized as Precious Metals, while GDXW is Gold. They also come from different issuers: Sprott and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 1.02% for SPPP and 0.99% for GDXW.
Find the right allocation for SPPP and GDXW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer