SPPP.L vs. PL

Last updated Jul 1, 2026

SPPP.L (Invesco Physical Platinum) is Precious Metals fund tracking the Platinum, while PL (Planet Labs PBC) is a stock. Over the past 3 years, SPPP.L returned 17.64%/yr vs 114.49%/yr for PL. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

SPPP.L vs. PL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco Physical Platinum (SPPP.L) and Planet Labs PBC (PL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

SPPP.L is traded in GBp, while PL is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the PL values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPPP.L achieves a -20.95% return, which is significantly lower than PL's 70.95% return.

SPPP.L

• 1D: -1.64%
• 1M: -17.86%
• YTD: -20.95%
• 6M: -28.29%
• 1Y: 20.98%
• 3Y*: 17.64%
• 5Y*: 8.18%
• 10Y*: 3.71%

PL

• 1D: 6.04%
• 1M: -34.16%
• YTD: 70.95%
• 6M: 70.72%
• 1Y: 463.12%
• 3Y*: 114.49%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPPP.L vs. PL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
SPPP.L Invesco Physical Platinum	-20.95%	104.81%	-8.43%	-10.70%	24.01%	-1.96%
PL Planet Labs PBC	70.95%	353.34%	66.42%	-46.06%	-20.86%	-46.67%

Correlation

The correlation between SPPP.L and PL is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.16
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.17
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2021	0.12

Return for Risk

SPPP.L vs. PL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPPP.L

SPPP.L Risk / Return Rank: 16
SPPP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
SPPP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
SPPP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 19
SPPP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
SPPP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 14

PL

PL Risk / Return Rank: 97
PL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
PL Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
PL Omega Ratio Rank: 95
PL Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
PL Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPPP.L vs. PL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Physical Platinum (SPPP.L) and Planet Labs PBC (PL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SPPP.L	PL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.45	4.55	-4.10
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.87	4.15	-3.28
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.12	1.55	-0.43
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.48	9.78	-9.30
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.09	29.74	-28.65

SPPP.L vs. PL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPPP.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.45, which is lower than the PL Sharpe Ratio of 4.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPPP.L and PL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SPPP.L vs. PL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPPP.L drawdown since its inception was -44.86%, smaller than the maximum PL drawdown of -84.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPPP.L and PL.

Drawdown Indicators

	SPPP.L	PL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-44.86%	-84.27%	+39.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-43.34%	-47.76%	+4.42%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-43.34%	-57.84%	+14.50%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-43.34%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-44.86%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-43.34%	-34.55%	-8.79%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.62%	-53.95%	+34.33%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	19.23%	15.67%	+3.56%

Volatility

SPPP.L vs. PL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Physical Platinum (SPPP.L) is 10.41%, while Planet Labs PBC (PL) has a volatility of 40.91%. This indicates that SPPP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SPPP.L	PL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.41%	40.91%	-30.50%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	39.73%	72.53%	-32.80%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	46.36%	102.58%	-56.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	30.57%	83.91%	-53.34%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.77%	83.91%	-56.14%

Dividends

SPPP.L vs. PL - Dividend Comparison

Neither SPPP.L nor PL has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SPPP.L and PL in my portfolio?

SPPP.L and PL have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.