PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPPP.L vs. FRES.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPPP.L vs. FRES.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco Physical Platinum (SPPP.L) and Fresnillo plc (FRES.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPPP.L achieves a -20.95% return, which is significantly lower than FRES.L's -15.96% return. Over the past 10 years, SPPP.L has underperformed FRES.L with an annualized return of 3.71%, while FRES.L has yielded a comparatively higher 7.10% annualized return.


SPPP.L

1D
-1.64%
1M
-17.86%
YTD
-20.95%
6M
-28.29%
1Y
20.98%
3Y*
17.64%
5Y*
8.18%
10Y*
3.71%

FRES.L

1D
-1.44%
1M
-16.59%
YTD
-15.96%
6M
-17.88%
1Y
96.36%
3Y*
70.39%
5Y*
31.92%
10Y*
7.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPPP.L vs. FRES.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPPP.L
Invesco Physical Platinum
-20.95%104.81%-8.43%-10.70%24.01%-10.35%7.05%17.67%-9.95%-6.88%
FRES.L
Fresnillo plc
-15.96%468.21%6.13%-32.98%3.90%-18.79%78.92%-24.01%-38.26%18.98%

Correlation

The correlation between SPPP.L and FRES.L is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2014

0.44

The correlation between SPPP.L and FRES.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (10 years) to 0.60 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPPP.L vs. FRES.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPPP.L
SPPP.L Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
SPPP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPPP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPPP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
SPPP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPPP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

FRES.L
FRES.L Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
FRES.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRES.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRES.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
FRES.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRES.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPPP.L vs. FRES.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Physical Platinum (SPPP.L) and Fresnillo plc (FRES.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPPP.LFRES.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.28

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.48

2.59

-2.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.09

6.08

-5.00

SPPP.L vs. FRES.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPPP.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.45, which is lower than the FRES.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPPP.L and FRES.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPPP.L vs. FRES.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPPP.L drawdown since its inception was -44.86%, smaller than the maximum FRES.L drawdown of -82.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPPP.L and FRES.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPPP.LFRES.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.86%

-82.49%

+37.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-43.34%

-37.00%

-6.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-43.34%

-37.00%

-6.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.34%

-53.75%

+10.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.86%

-74.56%

+29.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-43.34%

-37.00%

-6.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.62%

-42.85%

+23.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.23%

15.78%

+3.45%

Volatility

SPPP.L vs. FRES.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Physical Platinum (SPPP.L) is 10.41%, while Fresnillo plc (FRES.L) has a volatility of 16.50%. This indicates that SPPP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FRES.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPPP.LFRES.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.41%

16.50%

-6.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

39.73%

43.75%

-4.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

46.36%

56.04%

-9.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.57%

42.80%

-12.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.77%

43.23%

-15.46%

Dividends

SPPP.L vs. FRES.L - Dividend Comparison

SPPP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FRES.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.47%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FRES.L
Fresnillo plc
3.47%2.00%1.36%1.98%2.44%2.66%1.00%2.35%3.49%1.73%
SPPP.L
Invesco Physical Platinum
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPPP.L and FRES.L have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPPP.L and FRES.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer