SPOT vs. ADMA
SPOT (Spotify Technology S.A.) and ADMA (ADMA Biologics, Inc.) are both stocks. SPOT operates in Internet Content & Information (Communication Services), while ADMA operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare). Over the past 5 years, SPOT returned 14.62%/yr vs 35.16%/yr for ADMA. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SPOT vs. ADMA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPOT achieves a -17.00% return, which is significantly higher than ADMA's -54.99% return.
SPOT
- 1D
- -0.82%
- 1M
- 11.86%
- YTD
- -17.00%
- 6M
- -19.37%
- 1Y
- -31.42%
- 3Y*
- 47.06%
- 5Y*
- 14.62%
- 10Y*
- —
ADMA
- 1D
- -1.32%
- 1M
- -3.41%
- YTD
- -54.99%
- 6M
- -58.49%
- 1Y
- -61.99%
- 3Y*
- 27.09%
- 5Y*
- 35.16%
- 10Y*
- 1.84%
SPOT vs. ADMA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPOT Spotify Technology S.A. | -17.00% | 29.80% | 138.08% | 138.01% | -66.27% | -25.62% | 110.40% | 31.76% | -31.59% |
ADMA ADMA Biologics, Inc. | -54.99% | 6.36% | 279.42% | 16.49% | 175.18% | -27.69% | -51.25% | 67.36% | -45.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPOT and ADMA is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2018 | 0.21 |
The correlation between SPOT and ADMA shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (1 year) to 0.28 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
SPOT:
$100.87B
ADMA:
$1.97B
SPOT:
€12.94
ADMA:
$0.68
SPOT:
32.21
ADMA:
12.13
SPOT:
4.98
ADMA:
3.93
SPOT:
10.87
ADMA:
5.05
SPOT:
€17.60B
ADMA:
$509.86M
SPOT:
€5.68B
ADMA:
$312.42M
SPOT:
€2.75B
ADMA:
$218.74M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPOT vs. ADMA — Risk / Return Rank
SPOT
ADMA
SPOT vs. ADMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Spotify Technology S.A. (SPOT) and ADMA Biologics, Inc. (ADMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPOT | ADMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.98 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 0.76 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.67 | -0.98 | +0.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.16 | -1.95 | +0.79 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPOT vs. ADMA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPOT drawdown since its inception was -80.51%, smaller than the maximum ADMA drawdown of -91.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPOT and ADMA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPOT | ADMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.51% | -91.28% | +10.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -46.80% | -63.48% | +16.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -46.80% | -68.99% | +22.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -76.39% | -68.99% | -7.40% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -86.11% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -37.88% | -66.50% | +28.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.87% | -53.05% | +22.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 27.16% | 33.85% | -6.69% |
Volatility
SPOT vs. ADMA - Volatility Comparison
Spotify Technology S.A. (SPOT) has a higher volatility of 16.23% compared to ADMA Biologics, Inc. (ADMA) at 9.74%. This indicates that SPOT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ADMA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPOT | ADMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.23% | 9.74% | +6.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.28% | 45.54% | -8.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 45.28% | 54.60% | -9.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 47.58% | 59.47% | -11.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.36% | 69.03% | -21.67% |
Dividends
SPOT vs. ADMA - Dividend Comparison
Neither SPOT nor ADMA has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
SPOT vs. ADMA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Spotify Technology S.A. and ADMA Biologics, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SPOT vs. ADMA - Profitability Comparison
SPOT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Spotify Technology S.A. reported a gross profit of 1.51B and revenue of 4.61B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 32.9%.
ADMA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ADMA Biologics, Inc. reported a gross profit of 80.75M and revenue of 114.49M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 70.5%.
SPOT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Spotify Technology S.A. reported an operating income of 726.76M and revenue of 4.61B, resulting in an operating margin of 15.8%.
ADMA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ADMA Biologics, Inc. reported an operating income of 58.27M and revenue of 114.49M, resulting in an operating margin of 50.9%.
SPOT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Spotify Technology S.A. reported a net income of 732.86M and revenue of 4.61B, resulting in a net margin of 15.9%.
ADMA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ADMA Biologics, Inc. reported a net income of 45.33M and revenue of 114.49M, resulting in a net margin of 39.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SPOT and ADMA have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPOT has higher volatility (16.23%) compared to ADMA (9.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPOT dropped -80.51% vs ADMA's -91.28%.
SPOT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.70 vs -1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPOT and ADMA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer