PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
SPOL.L vs. XDN0.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

SPOL.L vs. XDN0.L

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SPOL.L (iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and XDN0.L (Xtrackers MSCI Nordic UCITS ETF 1D) are both Europe Equities funds - SPOL.L tracks the MSCI Poland NR EUR while XDN0.L tracks the MSCI Nordic Countries NR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPOL.L returned 10.37%/yr vs 9.86%/yr for XDN0.L. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SPOL.L charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for XDN0.L.

Performance

SPOL.L vs. XDN0.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SPOL.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Nordic UCITS ETF 1D (XDN0.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPOL.L achieves a 14.98% return, which is significantly higher than XDN0.L's 7.38% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SPOL.L having a 10.37% annualized return and XDN0.L not far behind at 9.86%.

SPOL.L

1D
0.05%
1M
6.06%
YTD
14.98%
6M
24.72%
1Y
44.16%
3Y*
30.21%
5Y*
14.86%
10Y*
10.37%

XDN0.L

1D
-0.69%
1M
2.03%
YTD
7.38%
6M
11.78%
1Y
15.65%
3Y*
8.39%
5Y*
5.64%
10Y*
9.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPOL.L vs. XDN0.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPOL.L
iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc)		14.98%61.27%-4.98%41.52%-17.96%8.30%-14.19%-9.68%-7.69%40.45%
XDN0.L
Xtrackers MSCI Nordic UCITS ETF 1D		7.38%12.19%-5.68%14.11%-5.97%20.44%23.02%16.30%-6.01%15.05%

Correlation

The correlation between SPOL.L and XDN0.L is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2013

0.44

SPOL.L vs. XDN0.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
SPOL.L
XDN0.L

Financial Services

48.0%
22.0%

Energy

16.7%
3.7%

Consumer Cyclical

10.9%
2.0%

Basic Materials

9.8%
5.6%

Consumer Defensive

5.4%
3.8%

Communication Services

3.2%
7.1%

Technology

2.2%
7.8%

Utilities

2.0%
1.6%

Industrials

1.9%
34.0%

Healthcare

-

11.8%

Real Estate

-

0.6%

Financial Services

SPOL.L
48.0%
XDN0.L
22.0%

Energy

SPOL.L
16.7%
XDN0.L
3.7%

Consumer Cyclical

SPOL.L
10.9%
XDN0.L
2.0%

Basic Materials

SPOL.L
9.8%
XDN0.L
5.6%

Consumer Defensive

SPOL.L
5.4%
XDN0.L
3.8%

Communication Services

SPOL.L
3.2%
XDN0.L
7.1%

Technology

SPOL.L
2.2%
XDN0.L
7.8%

Utilities

SPOL.L
2.0%
XDN0.L
1.6%

Industrials

SPOL.L
1.9%
XDN0.L
34.0%

Healthcare

SPOL.L

-

XDN0.L
11.8%

Real Estate

SPOL.L

-

XDN0.L
0.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc)

Xtrackers MSCI Nordic UCITS ETF 1D

Often compared with SPOL.L:
SPOL.L vs. IBCJ.DESPOL.L vs. VOOSPOL.L vs. WDEP.LSPOL.L vs. FLXD.LSPOL.L vs. XD5E.LSPOL.L vs. LCPE.LSPOL.L vs. EEIP.L
Often compared with XDN0.L:
XDN0.L vs. FNORXXDN0.L vs. LGUG.LXDN0.L vs. X7PP.LXDN0.L vs. EWSP.LXDN0.L vs. PPHXDN0.L vs. SPYXDN0.L vs. ^GSPC

Return for Risk

SPOL.L vs. XDN0.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
SPOL.L
SPOL.L Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
SPOL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPOL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPOL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
SPOL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPOL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
XDN0.L
XDN0.L Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
XDN0.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDN0.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDN0.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
XDN0.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDN0.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPOL.L vs. XDN0.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SPOL.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Nordic UCITS ETF 1D (XDN0.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

SPOL.LXDN0.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.90
1.05

+0.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.61
1.49

+1.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.19

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.62

1.68

+2.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.04

4.76

+6.28

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SPOL.L vs. XDN0.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPOL.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is higher than the XDN0.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPOL.L and XDN0.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

SPOL.LXDN0.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.90

1.05

+0.85

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

0.33

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

0.64

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.16

0.63

-0.47

Drawdowns

SPOL.L vs. XDN0.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPOL.L drawdown since its inception was -56.64%, which is greater than XDN0.L's maximum drawdown of -24.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPOL.L and XDN0.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

SPOL.LXDN0.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.64%

-24.85%

-31.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.51%

-9.35%

-0.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.47%

-24.78%

+5.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.27%

-24.78%

-21.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.64%

-24.85%

-31.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.16%

-1.46%

+0.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.80%

-6.11%

-15.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.99%

3.30%

+0.69%

Volatility

SPOL.L vs. XDN0.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SPOL.L) has a higher volatility of 7.20% compared to Xtrackers MSCI Nordic UCITS ETF 1D (XDN0.L) at 4.08%. This indicates that SPOL.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDN0.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

SPOL.LXDN0.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.20%

4.08%

+3.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.30%

11.11%

+6.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.18%

14.97%

+8.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.10%

17.32%

+9.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.42%

18.25%

+7.17%

SPOL.L vs. XDN0.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPOL.L has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than XDN0.L's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

SPOL.L vs. XDN0.L - Dividend Comparison

SPOL.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XDN0.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.51%.

PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
SPOL.L
iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc)		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XDN0.L
Xtrackers MSCI Nordic UCITS ETF 1D		2.51%2.80%2.83%2.51%4.53%1.09%4.82%4.18%1.05%2.34%1.52%

Frequently Asked Questions

SPOL.L and XDN0.L have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XDN0.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDN0.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for SPOL.L.

SPOL.L tracks MSCI Poland NR EUR, while XDN0.L tracks MSCI Nordic Countries NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for SPOL.L and 0.30% for XDN0.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPOL.L and XDN0.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer