PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
SPOL.L vs. CMB1.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

SPOL.L vs. CMB1.L

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SPOL.L (iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and CMB1.L (iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both Europe Equities funds from iShares - SPOL.L tracks the MSCI Poland NR EUR while CMB1.L tracks the FTSE Italia AllShare TR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPOL.L returned 10.37%/yr vs 16.24%/yr for CMB1.L. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SPOL.L charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.33%/yr for CMB1.L.

Performance

SPOL.L vs. CMB1.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SPOL.L) and iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (Acc) (CMB1.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPOL.L achieves a 14.98% return, which is significantly higher than CMB1.L's 13.57% return. Over the past 10 years, SPOL.L has underperformed CMB1.L with an annualized return of 10.37%, while CMB1.L has yielded a comparatively higher 16.24% annualized return.

SPOL.L

1D
0.05%
1M
6.06%
YTD
14.98%
6M
24.72%
1Y
44.16%
3Y*
30.21%
5Y*
14.86%
10Y*
10.37%

CMB1.L

1D
-0.72%
1M
5.16%
YTD
13.57%
6M
17.25%
1Y
34.15%
3Y*
28.69%
5Y*
19.90%
10Y*
16.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPOL.L vs. CMB1.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPOL.L
iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc)		14.98%61.27%-4.98%41.52%-17.96%8.30%-14.19%-9.68%-7.69%40.45%
CMB1.L
iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (Acc)		13.57%43.83%13.25%30.68%-3.56%18.29%1.52%24.83%-12.74%21.01%

Correlation

The correlation between SPOL.L and CMB1.L is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2011

0.48

The correlation between SPOL.L and CMB1.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

SPOL.L vs. CMB1.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
SPOL.L
CMB1.L

Financial Services

48.0%
45.1%

Energy

16.7%
8.8%

Consumer Cyclical

10.9%
10.0%

Basic Materials

9.8%
0.6%

Consumer Defensive

5.4%
0.5%

Communication Services

3.2%
1.1%

Technology

2.2%
4.6%

Utilities

2.0%
17.2%

Industrials

1.9%
10.8%

Healthcare

-

1.1%

Real Estate

-

0.3%

Financial Services

SPOL.L
48.0%
CMB1.L
45.1%

Energy

SPOL.L
16.7%
CMB1.L
8.8%

Consumer Cyclical

SPOL.L
10.9%
CMB1.L
10.0%

Basic Materials

SPOL.L
9.8%
CMB1.L
0.6%

Consumer Defensive

SPOL.L
5.4%
CMB1.L
0.5%

Communication Services

SPOL.L
3.2%
CMB1.L
1.1%

Technology

SPOL.L
2.2%
CMB1.L
4.6%

Utilities

SPOL.L
2.0%
CMB1.L
17.2%

Industrials

SPOL.L
1.9%
CMB1.L
10.8%

Healthcare

SPOL.L

-

CMB1.L
1.1%

Real Estate

SPOL.L

-

CMB1.L
0.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc)

iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (Acc)

Often compared with SPOL.L:
SPOL.L vs. IBCJ.DESPOL.L vs. VOOSPOL.L vs. WDEP.LSPOL.L vs. FLXD.LSPOL.L vs. XD5E.LSPOL.L vs. LCPE.LSPOL.L vs. EEIP.L
Often compared with CMB1.L:
CMB1.L vs. XDEM.LCMB1.L vs. IITU.LCMB1.L vs. H50E.LCMB1.L vs. SPYCMB1.L vs. X7PP.LCMB1.L vs. IQSA.LCMB1.L vs. EQQQ.L

Return for Risk

SPOL.L vs. CMB1.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
SPOL.L
SPOL.L Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
SPOL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPOL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPOL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
SPOL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPOL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
CMB1.L
CMB1.L Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
CMB1.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMB1.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMB1.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
CMB1.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMB1.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPOL.L vs. CMB1.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SPOL.L) and iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (Acc) (CMB1.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

SPOL.LCMB1.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.90
2.26

-0.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.61
3.07

-0.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.40

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.62

3.30

+1.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.04

12.01

-0.97

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SPOL.L vs. CMB1.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPOL.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is comparable to the CMB1.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPOL.L and CMB1.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

SPOL.LCMB1.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.90

2.26

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

1.11

-0.56

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

0.83

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.16

0.47

-0.31

Drawdowns

SPOL.L vs. CMB1.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPOL.L drawdown since its inception was -56.64%, which is greater than CMB1.L's maximum drawdown of -47.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPOL.L and CMB1.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

SPOL.LCMB1.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.64%

-47.37%

-9.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.51%

-10.32%

+0.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.47%

-15.62%

-3.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.27%

-24.19%

-22.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.64%

-36.61%

-20.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.16%

-0.72%

-0.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.80%

-8.80%

-13.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.99%

2.84%

+1.15%

Volatility

SPOL.L vs. CMB1.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SPOL.L) has a higher volatility of 7.20% compared to iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (Acc) (CMB1.L) at 4.47%. This indicates that SPOL.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CMB1.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

SPOL.LCMB1.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.20%

4.47%

+2.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.30%

12.15%

+5.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.18%

15.06%

+8.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.10%

18.00%

+9.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.42%

19.52%

+5.90%

SPOL.L vs. CMB1.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPOL.L has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than CMB1.L's 0.33% expense ratio.

Dividends

SPOL.L vs. CMB1.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither SPOL.L nor CMB1.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

SPOL.L and CMB1.L have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CMB1.L is cheaper at 0.33% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CMB1.L is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for SPOL.L.

SPOL.L tracks MSCI Poland NR EUR, while CMB1.L tracks FTSE Italia AllShare TR EUR. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for SPOL.L and 0.33% for CMB1.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPOL.L and CMB1.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer