PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPOG vs. CRMU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPOG vs. CRMU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long SPOT Daily ETF (SPOG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CRML Daily ETF (CRMU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


SPOG

1D
-1.65%
1M
-24.63%
YTD
-49.59%
6M
-49.32%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CRMU

1D
-13.83%
1M
-28.54%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPOG vs. CRMU - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SPOG and CRMU is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 10, 2026

0.04

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPOG vs. CRMU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long SPOT Daily ETF (SPOG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CRML Daily ETF (CRMU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SPOG vs. CRMU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPOG vs. CRMU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPOG drawdown since its inception was -64.41%, smaller than the maximum CRMU drawdown of -73.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPOG and CRMU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPOGCRMUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.41%

-73.81%

+9.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-59.44%

-64.46%

+5.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-41.38%

-46.63%

+5.25%

Volatility

SPOG vs. CRMU - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPOGCRMUDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

100.37%

246.03%

-145.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

100.37%

246.03%

-145.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

100.37%

246.03%

-145.66%

SPOG vs. CRMU - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SPOG and CRMU have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Dividends

SPOG vs. CRMU - Dividend Comparison

Neither SPOG nor CRMU has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SPOG and CRMU have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPOG and CRMU have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

SPOG and CRMU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPOG and CRMU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer