SPOG vs. BSMW
SPOG (Leverage Shares 2X Long SPOT Daily ETF) and BSMW (Invesco BulletShares 2032 Municipal Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPOG is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Leverage Shares, while BSMW is a Municipal Bonds fund tracking the Invesco BulletShares USD Municipal Bond 2032 Index. SPOG is actively managed, while BSMW is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.07, they often move in opposite directions. SPOG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for BSMW.
Performance
SPOG vs. BSMW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPOG achieves a -45.69% return, which is significantly lower than BSMW's 1.28% return.
SPOG
- 1D
- -4.20%
- 1M
- 0.55%
- 6M
- -28.66%
- YTD
- -45.69%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BSMW
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- -0.02%
- 6M
- 0.36%
- YTD
- 1.28%
- 1Y
- 6.03%
- 3Y*
- 2.64%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPOG vs. BSMW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SPOG Leverage Shares 2X Long SPOT Daily ETF | -45.69% | -18.73% |
BSMW Invesco BulletShares 2032 Municipal Bond ETF | 1.28% | 0.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPOG and BSMW is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2025 | -0.07 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPOG vs. BSMW — Risk / Return Rank
SPOG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BSMW
SPOG vs. BSMW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long SPOT Daily ETF (SPOG) and Invesco BulletShares 2032 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPOG | BSMW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.48 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.08 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 6.37 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPOG vs. BSMW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPOG drawdown since its inception was -64.41%, which is greater than BSMW's maximum drawdown of -7.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPOG and BSMW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPOG | BSMW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.41% | -7.57% | -56.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.92% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -7.34% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -56.30% | -1.00% | -55.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -42.83% | -1.69% | -41.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.95% | — |
Volatility
SPOG vs. BSMW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPOG | BSMW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.43% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 1.91% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 97.10% | 2.58% | +94.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 97.10% | 4.92% | +92.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 97.10% | 4.92% | +92.18% |
SPOG vs. BSMW - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPOG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than BSMW's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPOG vs. BSMW - Dividend Comparison
SPOG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BSMW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.20%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BSMW Invesco BulletShares 2032 Municipal Bond ETF | 3.20% | 3.24% | 3.48% | 2.36% |
SPOG Leverage Shares 2X Long SPOT Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPOG and BSMW have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BSMW is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BSMW is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for SPOG.
BSMW has the higher dividend yield at 3.20%, compared with 0.00% for SPOG.
SPOG is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while BSMW is Municipal Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for SPOG and 0.18% for BSMW.
Find the right allocation for SPOG and BSMW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer