PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPOG.L vs. ISAC.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPOG.L vs. ISAC.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Oil & Gas Exploration & Production UCITS ETF (SPOG.L) and iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ISAC.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SPOG.L is traded in GBp, while ISAC.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ISAC.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPOG.L achieves a 28.42% return, which is significantly higher than ISAC.L's 12.06% return. Over the past 10 years, SPOG.L has underperformed ISAC.L with an annualized return of 8.27%, while ISAC.L has yielded a comparatively higher 13.48% annualized return.


SPOG.L

1D
1.98%
1M
-1.72%
YTD
28.42%
6M
24.11%
1Y
37.28%
3Y*
11.67%
5Y*
17.41%
10Y*
8.27%

ISAC.L

1D
0.00%
1M
5.28%
YTD
12.06%
6M
12.30%
1Y
30.14%
3Y*
18.17%
5Y*
12.60%
10Y*
13.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPOG.L vs. ISAC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPOG.L
iShares Oil & Gas Exploration & Production UCITS ETF
28.42%-0.88%0.57%-2.90%54.40%69.37%-33.93%4.75%-17.09%-12.48%
ISAC.L
iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
12.06%13.64%19.87%16.44%-8.43%19.97%12.26%20.98%-4.37%13.63%

Correlation

The correlation between SPOG.L and ISAC.L is -0.19, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2011

0.43

The correlation between SPOG.L and ISAC.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.19 (1 year) to 0.43 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SPOG.L vs. ISAC.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPOG.L
ISAC.L

Energy

100.0%
3.6%

Basic Materials

-

2.9%

Communication Services

-

8.6%

Consumer Cyclical

-

8.5%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.4%

Financial Services

-

17.3%

Healthcare

-

7.8%

Industrials

-

9.0%

Real Estate

-

1.2%

Technology

-

33.9%

Utilities

-

2.2%

Energy

SPOG.L
100.0%
ISAC.L
3.6%

Basic Materials

SPOG.L

-

ISAC.L
2.9%

Communication Services

SPOG.L

-

ISAC.L
8.6%

Consumer Cyclical

SPOG.L

-

ISAC.L
8.5%

Consumer Defensive

SPOG.L

-

ISAC.L
4.4%

Financial Services

SPOG.L

-

ISAC.L
17.3%

Healthcare

SPOG.L

-

ISAC.L
7.8%

Industrials

SPOG.L

-

ISAC.L
9.0%

Real Estate

SPOG.L

-

ISAC.L
1.2%

Technology

SPOG.L

-

ISAC.L
33.9%

Utilities

SPOG.L

-

ISAC.L
2.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPOG.L vs. ISAC.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPOG.L
SPOG.L Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
SPOG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPOG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPOG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
SPOG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPOG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

ISAC.L
ISAC.L Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
ISAC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISAC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISAC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
ISAC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISAC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPOG.L vs. ISAC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Oil & Gas Exploration & Production UCITS ETF (SPOG.L) and iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ISAC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPOG.LISAC.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.48

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.16

4.36

-2.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.84

16.74

-10.90

SPOG.L vs. ISAC.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPOG.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is lower than the ISAC.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPOG.L and ISAC.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPOG.LISAC.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.37

2.52

-1.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

0.88

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

0.87

-0.61

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.15

0.86

-0.71

Drawdowns

SPOG.L vs. ISAC.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPOG.L drawdown since its inception was -76.49%, which is greater than ISAC.L's maximum drawdown of -25.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPOG.L and ISAC.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPOG.LISAC.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.49%

-25.84%

-50.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.14%

-6.88%

-10.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.87%

-18.33%

-11.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.90%

-18.33%

-14.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-71.97%

-25.84%

-46.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.32%

-0.36%

-9.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.50%

-3.56%

-22.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.37%

1.80%

+4.57%

Volatility

SPOG.L vs. ISAC.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Oil & Gas Exploration & Production UCITS ETF (SPOG.L) has a higher volatility of 9.65% compared to iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ISAC.L) at 3.74%. This indicates that SPOG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ISAC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPOG.LISAC.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.65%

3.74%

+5.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.82%

9.25%

+13.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.20%

11.90%

+15.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.32%

14.29%

+15.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.94%

15.49%

+16.45%

SPOG.L vs. ISAC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPOG.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than ISAC.L's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPOG.L vs. ISAC.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither SPOG.L nor ISAC.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SPOG.L and ISAC.L have a correlation of -0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ISAC.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ISAC.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for SPOG.L.

SPOG.L is categorized as Energy Equities, while ISAC.L is Global Equities. SPOG.L tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD, while ISAC.L tracks MSCI ACWI Index. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for SPOG.L and 0.20% for ISAC.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPOG.L and ISAC.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer