SPMO vs. XNTK
SPMO (Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF) and XNTK (SPDR NYSE Technology ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P 500 Momentum Index, while XNTK is a Technology Equities fund tracking the NYSE Technology Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPMO returned 20.86%/yr vs 25.25%/yr for XNTK. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SPMO charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XNTK.
Performance
SPMO vs. XNTK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPMO achieves a 28.15% return, which is significantly lower than XNTK's 32.86% return. Over the past 10 years, SPMO has underperformed XNTK with an annualized return of 20.86%, while XNTK has yielded a comparatively higher 25.25% annualized return.
SPMO
- 1D
- 1.26%
- 1M
- 6.27%
- YTD
- 28.15%
- 6M
- 28.70%
- 1Y
- 44.90%
- 3Y*
- 41.53%
- 5Y*
- 23.50%
- 10Y*
- 20.86%
XNTK
- 1D
- 0.69%
- 1M
- 9.85%
- YTD
- 32.86%
- 6M
- 32.78%
- 1Y
- 65.70%
- 3Y*
- 39.05%
- 5Y*
- 19.92%
- 10Y*
- 25.25%
SPMO vs. XNTK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 28.15% | 26.58% | 45.82% | 17.56% | -10.45% | 22.64% | 28.25% | 25.93% | -0.92% | 27.76% |
XNTK SPDR NYSE Technology ETF | 32.86% | 38.06% | 23.49% | 70.13% | -41.07% | 17.63% | 73.91% | 38.08% | -7.13% | 40.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPMO and XNTK is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2015 | 0.72 |
The correlation between SPMO and XNTK shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (all time) to 0.84 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SPMO vs. XNTK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPMO
XNTK
Technology
Industrials
-
Communication Services
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
-
Technology
SPMO
XNTK
Industrials
SPMO
XNTK
-
Communication Services
SPMO
XNTK
Healthcare
SPMO
XNTK
-
Financial Services
SPMO
XNTK
-
Consumer Defensive
SPMO
XNTK
-
Energy
SPMO
XNTK
-
Utilities
SPMO
XNTK
-
Basic Materials
SPMO
XNTK
-
Consumer Cyclical
SPMO
XNTK
Real Estate
SPMO
XNTK
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPMO vs. XNTK — Risk / Return Rank
SPMO
XNTK
SPMO vs. XNTK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) and SPDR NYSE Technology ETF (XNTK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPMO | XNTK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.42 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.44 | 3.73 | -0.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.01 | 12.16 | +0.84 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPMO vs. XNTK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPMO drawdown since its inception was -30.95%, smaller than the maximum XNTK drawdown of -72.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPMO and XNTK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPMO | XNTK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.95% | -72.38% | +41.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.70% | -17.00% | +4.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.13% | -28.11% | +7.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.74% | -48.28% | +25.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.95% | -48.28% | +17.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.68% | -4.70% | +3.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.60% | -21.28% | +16.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.35% | 5.21% | -1.86% |
Volatility
SPMO vs. XNTK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) is 10.29%, while SPDR NYSE Technology ETF (XNTK) has a volatility of 12.53%. This indicates that SPMO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XNTK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPMO | XNTK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.29% | 12.53% | -2.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.73% | 20.87% | -4.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.48% | 25.43% | -5.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.65% | 28.25% | -8.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.48% | 26.82% | -6.34% |
SPMO vs. XNTK - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPMO has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than XNTK's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPMO vs. XNTK - Dividend Comparison
SPMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, more than XNTK's 0.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.67% | 0.73% | 0.48% | 1.63% | 1.66% | 0.52% | 1.27% | 1.39% | 1.05% | 0.77% | 1.94% | 0.36% |
XNTK SPDR NYSE Technology ETF | 0.17% | 0.23% | 0.42% | 0.34% | 0.85% | 0.34% | 0.30% | 0.61% | 29.64% | 1.29% | 0.81% | 0.93% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPMO and XNTK have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XNTK has higher volatility (12.53%) compared to SPMO (10.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPMO dropped -30.95% vs XNTK's -72.38%.
On 10-year performance, XNTK leads with 25.25% vs 20.86% for SPMO. On fees, SPMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, SPMO has been the lower-risk option at 10.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XNTK has performed better with a 25.25% return vs 20.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XNTK.
SPMO has the higher dividend yield at 0.67%, compared with 0.17% for XNTK.
SPMO is categorized as Momentum, while XNTK is Technology Equities. SPMO tracks S&P 500 Momentum Index, while XNTK tracks NYSE Technology Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for SPMO and 0.35% for XNTK.
XNTK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPMO and XNTK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer