PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPMO vs. XLP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPMO vs. XLP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) and State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPMO achieves a 32.66% return, which is significantly higher than XLP's 10.66% return. Over the past 10 years, SPMO has outperformed XLP with an annualized return of 21.24%, while XLP has yielded a comparatively lower 7.58% annualized return.


SPMO

1D
3.52%
1M
10.01%
YTD
32.66%
6M
33.70%
1Y
50.00%
3Y*
43.16%
5Y*
24.34%
10Y*
21.24%

XLP

1D
-0.40%
1M
0.99%
YTD
10.66%
6M
8.80%
1Y
8.50%
3Y*
7.50%
5Y*
6.92%
10Y*
7.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPMO vs. XLP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
32.66%26.58%45.82%17.56%-10.45%22.64%28.25%25.93%-0.92%27.76%
XLP
State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF
10.66%1.52%12.20%-0.82%-0.81%17.20%10.11%27.43%-8.07%12.98%

Correlation

The correlation between SPMO and XLP is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2015

0.36

The correlation between SPMO and XLP shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (1 year) to 0.37 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SPMO vs. XLP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPMO
XLP

Technology

54.9%

-

Industrials

11.1%

-

Communication Services

8.2%

-

Healthcare

6.4%

-

Financial Services

5.9%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.1%
99.0%

Energy

3.1%

-

Utilities

2.5%

-

Basic Materials

1.5%

-

Consumer Cyclical

1.2%
1.0%

Real Estate

1.0%

-

Technology

SPMO
54.9%
XLP

-

Industrials

SPMO
11.1%
XLP

-

Communication Services

SPMO
8.2%
XLP

-

Healthcare

SPMO
6.4%
XLP

-

Financial Services

SPMO
5.9%
XLP

-

Consumer Defensive

SPMO
4.1%
XLP
99.0%

Energy

SPMO
3.1%
XLP

-

Utilities

SPMO
2.5%
XLP

-

Basic Materials

SPMO
1.5%
XLP

-

Consumer Cyclical

SPMO
1.2%
XLP
1.0%

Real Estate

SPMO
1.0%
XLP

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPMO vs. XLP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPMO
SPMO Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
SPMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPMO Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
SPMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPMO Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

XLP
XLP Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
XLP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLP Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLP Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
XLP Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLP Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPMO vs. XLP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) and State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPMOXLPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.12

+0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.96

0.88

+3.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.96

1.70

+13.26

SPMO vs. XLP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPMO Sharpe Ratio is 2.55, which is higher than the XLP Sharpe Ratio of 0.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPMO and XLP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPMO vs. XLP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPMO drawdown since its inception was -30.95%, smaller than the maximum XLP drawdown of -35.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPMO and XLP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPMOXLPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.95%

-35.90%

+4.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.70%

-9.69%

-3.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.13%

-12.39%

-7.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.74%

-16.30%

-6.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.95%

-24.51%

-6.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-4.50%

+4.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.60%

-7.06%

+2.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.35%

5.02%

-1.67%

Volatility

SPMO vs. XLP - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) has a higher volatility of 10.78% compared to State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP) at 4.55%. This indicates that SPMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPMOXLPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.78%

4.55%

+6.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.04%

10.13%

+6.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.78%

12.85%

+6.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.71%

13.34%

+6.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.52%

14.75%

+5.77%

SPMO vs. XLP - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPMO has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is higher than XLP's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SPMO vs. XLP - Dividend Comparison

SPMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.64%, less than XLP's 2.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
0.64%0.73%0.48%1.63%1.66%0.52%1.27%1.39%1.05%0.77%1.94%0.36%
XLP
State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF
2.54%2.75%2.77%2.63%2.47%2.28%2.50%2.57%3.04%2.62%2.53%2.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPMO and XLP have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPMO has higher volatility (10.78%) compared to XLP (4.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPMO dropped -30.95% vs XLP's -35.90%.

On 10-year performance, SPMO leads with 21.24% vs 7.58% for XLP. On fees, XLP is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLP has been the lower-risk option at 4.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPMO has performed better with a 21.24% return vs 7.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLP is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.13% for SPMO.

XLP has the higher dividend yield at 2.54%, compared with 0.64% for SPMO.

SPMO is categorized as Momentum, while XLP is Consumer Staples Equities. SPMO tracks S&P 500 Momentum Index, while XLP tracks Consumer Staples Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for SPMO and 0.08% for XLP.

SPMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPMO and XLP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer