PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPMO vs. VOOG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPMO vs. VOOG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) and Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF (VOOG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPMO achieves a 21.26% return, which is significantly higher than VOOG's 9.39% return. Over the past 10 years, SPMO has outperformed VOOG with an annualized return of 20.08%, while VOOG has yielded a comparatively lower 17.65% annualized return.


SPMO

1D
-5.59%
1M
1.90%
YTD
21.26%
6M
20.02%
1Y
37.63%
3Y*
39.63%
5Y*
22.50%
10Y*
20.08%

VOOG

1D
-3.79%
1M
0.26%
YTD
9.39%
6M
8.44%
1Y
29.60%
3Y*
26.51%
5Y*
15.12%
10Y*
17.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPMO vs. VOOG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
21.26%26.58%45.82%17.56%-10.45%22.64%28.25%25.93%-0.92%27.76%
VOOG
Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF
9.39%22.11%35.89%29.96%-29.48%31.95%33.35%30.93%-0.21%27.19%

Correlation

The correlation between SPMO and VOOG is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2015

0.81

The correlation between SPMO and VOOG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

SPMO vs. VOOG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPMO
VOOG

Technology

52.6%
49.4%

Industrials

11.3%
6.2%

Communication Services

9.2%
18.0%

Healthcare

6.7%
5.8%

Financial Services

5.9%
8.8%

Consumer Defensive

4.3%
1.0%

Energy

3.4%
0.1%

Utilities

2.8%
0.4%

Basic Materials

1.6%
0.4%

Consumer Cyclical

1.3%
9.4%

Real Estate

1.0%
0.6%

Technology

SPMO
52.6%
VOOG
49.4%

Industrials

SPMO
11.3%
VOOG
6.2%

Communication Services

SPMO
9.2%
VOOG
18.0%

Healthcare

SPMO
6.7%
VOOG
5.8%

Financial Services

SPMO
5.9%
VOOG
8.8%

Consumer Defensive

SPMO
4.3%
VOOG
1.0%

Energy

SPMO
3.4%
VOOG
0.1%

Utilities

SPMO
2.8%
VOOG
0.4%

Basic Materials

SPMO
1.6%
VOOG
0.4%

Consumer Cyclical

SPMO
1.3%
VOOG
9.4%

Real Estate

SPMO
1.0%
VOOG
0.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPMO vs. VOOG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPMO
SPMO Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
SPMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPMO Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
SPMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPMO Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

VOOG
VOOG Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
VOOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOOG Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
VOOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOOG Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPMO vs. VOOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) and Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF (VOOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPMOVOOGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.32

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.98

2.17

+0.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.48

8.93

+2.55

SPMO vs. VOOG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPMO Sharpe Ratio is 2.04, which is comparable to the VOOG Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPMO and VOOG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPMOVOOGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.04

1.82

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.16

0.71

+0.45

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

0.85

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.97

0.89

+0.07

Drawdowns

SPMO vs. VOOG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPMO drawdown since its inception was -30.95%, smaller than the maximum VOOG drawdown of -32.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPMO and VOOG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPMOVOOGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.95%

-32.73%

+1.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.70%

-13.71%

+1.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.13%

-22.18%

+2.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.74%

-32.73%

+9.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.95%

-32.73%

+1.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.97%

-4.90%

-2.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.60%

-4.97%

+0.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.29%

3.32%

-0.03%

Volatility

SPMO vs. VOOG - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) has a higher volatility of 9.33% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF (VOOG) at 5.58%. This indicates that SPMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPMOVOOGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.33%

5.58%

+3.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.67%

13.03%

+2.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.61%

16.32%

+2.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.46%

21.24%

-1.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.39%

20.76%

-0.37%

SPMO vs. VOOG - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPMO has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is higher than VOOG's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SPMO vs. VOOG - Dividend Comparison

SPMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.70%, more than VOOG's 0.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
0.70%0.73%0.48%1.63%1.66%0.52%1.27%1.39%1.05%0.77%1.94%0.36%
VOOG
Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF
0.45%0.49%0.49%1.12%0.93%0.53%0.88%1.26%1.34%1.32%1.47%1.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPMO and VOOG have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPMO has higher volatility (9.33%) compared to VOOG (5.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPMO dropped -30.95% vs VOOG's -32.73%.

On 10-year performance, SPMO leads with 20.08% vs 17.65% for VOOG. On fees, VOOG is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, VOOG has been the lower-risk option at 5.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPMO has performed better with a 20.08% return vs 17.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOOG is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.13% for SPMO.

SPMO has the higher dividend yield at 0.70%, compared with 0.45% for VOOG.

SPMO is categorized as Momentum, while VOOG is S&P 500. SPMO tracks S&P 500 Momentum Index, while VOOG tracks S&P 500 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for SPMO and 0.07% for VOOG.

SPMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPMO and VOOG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer