SPMO vs. VNQ
SPMO (Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF) and VNQ (Vanguard Real Estate ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P 500 Momentum Index, while VNQ is a REIT fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Real Estate 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPMO returned 20.59%/yr vs 5.53%/yr for VNQ. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.13% expense ratio.
Performance
SPMO vs. VNQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPMO achieves a 26.56% return, which is significantly higher than VNQ's 11.49% return. Over the past 10 years, SPMO has outperformed VNQ with an annualized return of 20.59%, while VNQ has yielded a comparatively lower 5.53% annualized return.
SPMO
- 1D
- 4.80%
- 1M
- 4.24%
- YTD
- 26.56%
- 6M
- 24.30%
- 1Y
- 41.83%
- 3Y*
- 41.24%
- 5Y*
- 23.19%
- 10Y*
- 20.59%
VNQ
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 0.95%
- YTD
- 11.49%
- 6M
- 11.16%
- 1Y
- 12.43%
- 3Y*
- 10.04%
- 5Y*
- 2.36%
- 10Y*
- 5.53%
SPMO vs. VNQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 26.56% | 26.58% | 45.82% | 17.56% | -10.45% | 22.64% | 28.25% | 25.93% | -0.92% | 27.76% |
VNQ Vanguard Real Estate ETF | 11.49% | 3.24% | 4.81% | 11.85% | -26.25% | 40.54% | -4.61% | 28.91% | -6.03% | 4.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPMO and VNQ is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2015 | 0.42 |
Over the past year, the correlation between SPMO and VNQ has dropped to 0.18 - well below their long-term average of 0.42, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
SPMO vs. VNQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPMO
VNQ
Technology
Industrials
Communication Services
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
-
Real Estate
Technology
SPMO
VNQ
Industrials
SPMO
VNQ
Communication Services
SPMO
VNQ
Healthcare
SPMO
VNQ
-
Financial Services
SPMO
VNQ
Consumer Defensive
SPMO
VNQ
-
Energy
SPMO
VNQ
Utilities
SPMO
VNQ
-
Basic Materials
SPMO
VNQ
Consumer Cyclical
SPMO
VNQ
-
Real Estate
SPMO
VNQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPMO vs. VNQ — Risk / Return Rank
SPMO
VNQ
SPMO vs. VNQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) and Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPMO | VNQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.17 | +0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.31 | 1.50 | +1.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.52 | 4.71 | +7.81 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPMO vs. VNQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPMO drawdown since its inception was -30.95%, smaller than the maximum VNQ drawdown of -73.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPMO and VNQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPMO | VNQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.95% | -73.07% | +42.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.70% | -8.34% | -4.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.13% | -17.46% | -2.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.74% | -34.48% | +11.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.95% | -42.40% | +11.45% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.91% | -0.49% | -2.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.60% | -13.61% | +9.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.35% | 2.65% | +0.70% |
Volatility
SPMO vs. VNQ - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) has a higher volatility of 10.29% compared to Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ) at 4.74%. This indicates that SPMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VNQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPMO | VNQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.29% | 4.74% | +5.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.70% | 9.74% | +6.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.45% | 13.52% | +5.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.65% | 18.85% | +0.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.48% | 20.72% | -0.24% |
SPMO vs. VNQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SPMO and VNQ have an expense ratio of 0.13%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SPMO vs. VNQ - Dividend Comparison
SPMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, less than VNQ's 3.57% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.67% | 0.73% | 0.48% | 1.63% | 1.66% | 0.52% | 1.27% | 1.39% | 1.05% | 0.77% | 1.94% | 0.36% |
VNQ Vanguard Real Estate ETF | 3.57% | 3.92% | 3.85% | 3.95% | 3.91% | 2.56% | 3.93% | 3.39% | 4.74% | 4.23% | 4.82% | 3.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPMO and VNQ have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPMO has higher volatility (10.29%) compared to VNQ (4.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPMO dropped -30.95% vs VNQ's -73.07%.
On 10-year performance, SPMO leads with 20.59% vs 5.53% for VNQ. Both ETFs have the same 0.13% expense ratio. On volatility, VNQ has been the lower-risk option at 4.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPMO has performed better with a 20.59% return vs 5.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPMO and VNQ have the same expense ratio: 0.13% per year.
VNQ has the higher dividend yield at 3.57%, compared with 0.67% for SPMO.
SPMO is categorized as Momentum, while VNQ is REIT. SPMO tracks S&P 500 Momentum Index, while VNQ tracks MSCI US Investable Market Real Estate 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard.
SPMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPMO and VNQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer