SPMO vs. VGLT
SPMO (Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF) and VGLT (Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P 500 Momentum Index, while VGLT is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Long Treasury Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPMO returned 20.38%/yr vs -1.28%/yr for VGLT. At a correlation of -0.06, they often move in opposite directions. SPMO charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VGLT.
Performance
SPMO vs. VGLT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPMO achieves a 24.29% return, which is significantly higher than VGLT's -1.16% return. Over the past 10 years, SPMO has outperformed VGLT with an annualized return of 20.38%, while VGLT has yielded a comparatively lower -1.28% annualized return.
SPMO
- 1D
- 2.50%
- 1M
- 2.83%
- YTD
- 24.29%
- 6M
- 22.86%
- 1Y
- 39.53%
- 3Y*
- 40.28%
- 5Y*
- 23.06%
- 10Y*
- 20.38%
VGLT
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- -1.25%
- YTD
- -1.16%
- 6M
- -1.18%
- 1Y
- 4.15%
- 3Y*
- -0.94%
- 5Y*
- -5.66%
- 10Y*
- -1.28%
SPMO vs. VGLT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 24.29% | 26.58% | 45.82% | 17.56% | -10.45% | 22.64% | 28.25% | 25.93% | -0.92% | 27.76% |
VGLT Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF | -1.16% | 5.35% | -6.28% | 3.27% | -29.34% | -4.98% | 17.57% | 14.30% | -1.54% | 8.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPMO and VGLT is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.00 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2015 | -0.06 |
The correlation between SPMO and VGLT shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (10 years) to 0.13 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPMO vs. VGLT — Risk / Return Rank
SPMO
VGLT
SPMO vs. VGLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) and Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF (VGLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPMO | VGLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.08 | +0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.13 | 0.60 | +2.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.02 | 1.53 | +10.49 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPMO | VGLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.13 | 0.48 | +1.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.19 | -0.39 | +1.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.00 | -0.09 | +1.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.98 | 0.18 | +0.80 |
Drawdowns
SPMO vs. VGLT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPMO drawdown since its inception was -30.95%, smaller than the maximum VGLT drawdown of -46.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPMO and VGLT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPMO | VGLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.95% | -46.18% | +15.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.70% | -7.01% | -5.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.13% | -17.68% | -2.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.74% | -40.98% | +18.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.95% | -46.18% | +15.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.65% | -37.30% | +32.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.60% | -15.08% | +10.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.30% | 2.72% | +0.58% |
Volatility
SPMO vs. VGLT - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) has a higher volatility of 9.44% compared to Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF (VGLT) at 2.50%. This indicates that SPMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VGLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPMO | VGLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.44% | 2.50% | +6.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.82% | 5.96% | +9.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.72% | 8.71% | +10.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.50% | 14.57% | +4.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.41% | 13.82% | +6.59% |
SPMO vs. VGLT - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPMO has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is higher than VGLT's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SPMO vs. VGLT - Dividend Comparison
SPMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.69%, less than VGLT's 4.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.69% | 0.73% | 0.48% | 1.63% | 1.66% | 0.52% | 1.27% | 1.39% | 1.05% | 0.77% | 1.94% | 0.36% |
VGLT Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF | 4.64% | 4.44% | 4.33% | 3.33% | 2.84% | 1.82% | 2.15% | 2.46% | 2.71% | 2.55% | 2.69% | 3.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPMO and VGLT have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPMO has higher volatility (9.44%) compared to VGLT (2.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPMO dropped -30.95% vs VGLT's -46.18%.
On 10-year performance, SPMO leads with 20.38% vs -1.28% for VGLT. On fees, VGLT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VGLT has been the lower-risk option at 2.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPMO has performed better with a 20.38% return vs -1.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VGLT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.13% for SPMO.
VGLT has the higher dividend yield at 4.64%, compared with 0.69% for SPMO.
SPMO is categorized as Momentum, while VGLT is Government Bonds. SPMO tracks S&P 500 Momentum Index, while VGLT tracks Bloomberg U.S. Long Treasury Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for SPMO and 0.03% for VGLT.
SPMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPMO and VGLT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer