PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPMO vs. SPHD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPMO vs. SPHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) and Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (SPHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPMO achieves a 30.35% return, which is significantly higher than SPHD's 4.38% return. Over the past 10 years, SPMO has outperformed SPHD with an annualized return of 20.95%, while SPHD has yielded a comparatively lower 7.08% annualized return.


SPMO

1D
0.50%
1M
15.36%
YTD
30.35%
6M
30.51%
1Y
46.00%
3Y*
43.04%
5Y*
24.29%
10Y*
20.95%

SPHD

1D
-0.89%
1M
-0.82%
YTD
4.38%
6M
4.63%
1Y
8.12%
3Y*
11.42%
5Y*
5.48%
10Y*
7.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPMO vs. SPHD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
30.35%26.58%45.82%17.56%-10.45%22.64%28.25%25.93%-0.92%27.76%
SPHD
Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF
4.38%3.41%18.08%1.32%0.58%24.98%-9.98%20.26%-6.17%11.90%

Correlation

The correlation between SPMO and SPHD is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2015

0.39

Over the past year, the correlation between SPMO and SPHD has dropped to 0.07 - well below their long-term average of 0.39, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

SPMO vs. SPHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPMO
SPHD

Technology

52.6%
1.5%

Industrials

11.3%
0.0%

Communication Services

9.2%
8.6%

Healthcare

6.7%
5.1%

Financial Services

5.9%
15.6%

Consumer Defensive

4.3%
17.8%

Energy

3.4%
14.1%

Utilities

2.8%
13.7%

Basic Materials

1.6%

-

Consumer Cyclical

1.3%
3.4%

Real Estate

1.0%
20.1%

Technology

SPMO
52.6%
SPHD
1.5%

Industrials

SPMO
11.3%
SPHD
0.0%

Communication Services

SPMO
9.2%
SPHD
8.6%

Healthcare

SPMO
6.7%
SPHD
5.1%

Financial Services

SPMO
5.9%
SPHD
15.6%

Consumer Defensive

SPMO
4.3%
SPHD
17.8%

Energy

SPMO
3.4%
SPHD
14.1%

Utilities

SPMO
2.8%
SPHD
13.7%

Basic Materials

SPMO
1.6%
SPHD

-

Consumer Cyclical

SPMO
1.3%
SPHD
3.4%

Real Estate

SPMO
1.0%
SPHD
20.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPMO vs. SPHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPMO
SPMO Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
SPMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPMO Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
SPMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPMO Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

SPHD
SPHD Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
SPHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPHD Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
SPHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPHD Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPMO vs. SPHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) and Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (SPHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPMOSPHDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.13

+0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.64

1.11

+2.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.17

2.78

+11.38

SPMO vs. SPHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPMO Sharpe Ratio is 2.62, which is higher than the SPHD Sharpe Ratio of 0.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPMO and SPHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPMOSPHDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.62

0.74

+1.88

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.27

0.39

+0.88

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.03

0.40

+0.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.01

0.58

+0.43

Drawdowns

SPMO vs. SPHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPMO drawdown since its inception was -30.95%, smaller than the maximum SPHD drawdown of -41.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPMO and SPHD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPMOSPHDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.95%

-41.39%

+10.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.70%

-7.33%

-5.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.13%

-13.29%

-6.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.74%

-19.50%

-3.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.95%

-41.39%

+10.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-5.37%

+5.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.60%

-4.70%

+0.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.26%

2.93%

+0.33%

Volatility

SPMO vs. SPHD - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) has a higher volatility of 7.35% compared to Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (SPHD) at 2.99%. This indicates that SPMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPMOSPHDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.35%

2.99%

+4.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.39%

7.55%

+6.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.64%

11.04%

+6.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.30%

14.16%

+5.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.31%

17.64%

+2.67%

SPMO vs. SPHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPMO has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than SPHD's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPMO vs. SPHD - Dividend Comparison

SPMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, less than SPHD's 4.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPHD
Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF
4.62%4.02%3.41%4.48%3.89%3.45%4.89%4.07%4.40%3.14%3.83%3.49%
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
0.65%0.73%0.48%1.63%1.66%0.52%1.27%1.39%1.05%0.77%1.94%0.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPMO and SPHD have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPMO has higher volatility (7.35%) compared to SPHD (2.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPMO dropped -30.95% vs SPHD's -41.39%.

On 10-year performance, SPMO leads with 20.95% vs 7.08% for SPHD. On fees, SPMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, SPHD has been the lower-risk option at 2.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPMO has performed better with a 20.95% return vs 7.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for SPHD.

SPHD has the higher dividend yield at 4.62%, compared with 0.65% for SPMO.

SPMO is categorized as Momentum, while SPHD is S&P 500. SPMO tracks S&P 500 Momentum Index, while SPHD tracks S&P Low Volatility High Dividend index. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for SPMO and 0.30% for SPHD.

SPMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs 0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPMO and SPHD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer