SPMO vs. SIL
SPMO (Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF) and SIL (Global X Silver Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P 500 Momentum Index, while SIL is a Silver fund tracking the Solactive Global Silver Miners Total Return Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPMO returned 20.86%/yr vs 9.80%/yr for SIL. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SPMO charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for SIL.
Performance
SPMO vs. SIL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPMO achieves a 28.15% return, which is significantly higher than SIL's -2.20% return. Over the past 10 years, SPMO has outperformed SIL with an annualized return of 20.86%, while SIL has yielded a comparatively lower 9.80% annualized return.
SPMO
- 1D
- 1.26%
- 1M
- 6.27%
- YTD
- 28.15%
- 6M
- 28.70%
- 1Y
- 44.90%
- 3Y*
- 41.53%
- 5Y*
- 23.50%
- 10Y*
- 20.86%
SIL
- 1D
- 3.27%
- 1M
- -10.83%
- YTD
- -2.20%
- 6M
- 0.10%
- 1Y
- 69.43%
- 3Y*
- 46.50%
- 5Y*
- 12.56%
- 10Y*
- 9.80%
SPMO vs. SIL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 28.15% | 26.58% | 45.82% | 17.56% | -10.45% | 22.64% | 28.25% | 25.93% | -0.92% | 27.76% |
SIL Global X Silver Miners ETF | -2.20% | 166.16% | 14.62% | 1.31% | -22.83% | -18.35% | 40.30% | 34.78% | -22.42% | 1.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPMO and SIL is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2015 | 0.24 |
The correlation between SPMO and SIL shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (all time) to 0.38 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SPMO vs. SIL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPMO
SIL
Technology
-
Industrials
-
Communication Services
-
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
-
Consumer Defensive
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
SPMO
SIL
-
Industrials
SPMO
SIL
-
Communication Services
SPMO
SIL
-
Healthcare
SPMO
SIL
-
Financial Services
SPMO
SIL
-
Consumer Defensive
SPMO
SIL
Energy
SPMO
SIL
-
Utilities
SPMO
SIL
-
Basic Materials
SPMO
SIL
Consumer Cyclical
SPMO
SIL
-
Real Estate
SPMO
SIL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPMO vs. SIL — Risk / Return Rank
SPMO
SIL
SPMO vs. SIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) and Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPMO | SIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.25 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.44 | 1.91 | +1.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.01 | 5.09 | +7.91 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPMO vs. SIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPMO drawdown since its inception was -30.95%, smaller than the maximum SIL drawdown of -82.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPMO and SIL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPMO | SIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.95% | -82.99% | +52.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.70% | -37.08% | +24.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.13% | -37.08% | +16.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.74% | -52.77% | +30.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.95% | -63.04% | +32.09% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.68% | -30.80% | +29.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.60% | -51.40% | +46.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.35% | 13.90% | -10.55% |
Volatility
SPMO vs. SIL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) is 10.29%, while Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) has a volatility of 19.29%. This indicates that SPMO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPMO | SIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.29% | 19.29% | -9.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.73% | 43.57% | -26.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.48% | 51.69% | -32.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.65% | 39.64% | -19.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.48% | 39.81% | -19.33% |
SPMO vs. SIL - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPMO has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than SIL's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPMO vs. SIL - Dividend Comparison
SPMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, less than SIL's 1.21% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SIL Global X Silver Miners ETF | 1.21% | 1.18% | 2.40% | 0.59% | 0.48% | 1.59% | 1.92% | 1.53% | 1.21% | 0.02% | 3.34% | 0.38% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.67% | 0.73% | 0.48% | 1.63% | 1.66% | 0.52% | 1.27% | 1.39% | 1.05% | 0.77% | 1.94% | 0.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPMO and SIL have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SIL has higher volatility (19.29%) compared to SPMO (10.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPMO dropped -30.95% vs SIL's -82.99%.
On 10-year performance, SPMO leads with 20.86% vs 9.80% for SIL. On fees, SPMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, SPMO has been the lower-risk option at 10.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPMO has performed better with a 20.86% return vs 9.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for SIL.
SIL has the higher dividend yield at 1.21%, compared with 0.67% for SPMO.
SPMO is categorized as Momentum, while SIL is Silver. SPMO tracks S&P 500 Momentum Index, while SIL tracks Solactive Global Silver Miners Total Return Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for SPMO and 0.65% for SIL.
SPMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPMO and SIL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer