PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPMO vs. SCHP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPMO vs. SCHP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) and Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF (SCHP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPMO achieves a 28.15% return, which is significantly higher than SCHP's 1.42% return. Over the past 10 years, SPMO has outperformed SCHP with an annualized return of 20.86%, while SCHP has yielded a comparatively lower 2.60% annualized return.


SPMO

1D
1.26%
1M
3.36%
YTD
28.15%
6M
28.70%
1Y
44.90%
3Y*
41.53%
5Y*
23.50%
10Y*
20.86%

SCHP

1D
0.04%
1M
-0.10%
YTD
1.42%
6M
1.48%
1Y
4.83%
3Y*
4.14%
5Y*
1.06%
10Y*
2.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPMO vs. SCHP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
28.15%26.58%45.82%17.56%-10.45%22.64%28.25%25.93%-0.92%27.76%
SCHP
Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF
1.42%6.76%1.95%3.91%-12.02%5.87%10.86%8.52%-1.78%3.02%

Correlation

The correlation between SPMO and SCHP is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2015

0.05

SPMO vs. SCHP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPMO
SCHP

Technology

54.8%

-

Industrials

10.9%

-

Communication Services

8.7%

-

Healthcare

6.2%

-

Financial Services

5.7%
0.0%

Consumer Defensive

4.0%

-

Energy

3.1%

-

Utilities

2.5%

-

Basic Materials

1.6%

-

Consumer Cyclical

1.3%
100.0%

Real Estate

0.9%

-

Technology

SPMO
54.8%
SCHP

-

Industrials

SPMO
10.9%
SCHP

-

Communication Services

SPMO
8.7%
SCHP

-

Healthcare

SPMO
6.2%
SCHP

-

Financial Services

SPMO
5.7%
SCHP
0.0%

Consumer Defensive

SPMO
4.0%
SCHP

-

Energy

SPMO
3.1%
SCHP

-

Utilities

SPMO
2.5%
SCHP

-

Basic Materials

SPMO
1.6%
SCHP

-

Consumer Cyclical

SPMO
1.3%
SCHP
100.0%

Real Estate

SPMO
0.9%
SCHP

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPMO vs. SCHP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPMO
SPMO Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
SPMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPMO Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
SPMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPMO Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHP
SCHP Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
SCHP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHP Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHP Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPMO vs. SCHP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) and Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF (SCHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPMOSCHPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.25

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.44

2.45

+0.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.01

7.41

+5.60

SPMO vs. SCHP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPMO Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is higher than the SCHP Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPMO and SCHP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPMO vs. SCHP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPMO drawdown since its inception was -30.95%, which is greater than SCHP's maximum drawdown of -14.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPMO and SCHP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPMOSCHPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.95%

-14.26%

-16.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.70%

-1.93%

-10.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.13%

-4.48%

-15.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.74%

-14.26%

-8.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.95%

-14.26%

-16.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.68%

-0.44%

-1.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.60%

-3.93%

-0.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.35%

0.64%

+2.71%

Volatility

SPMO vs. SCHP - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) has a higher volatility of 10.29% compared to Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF (SCHP) at 1.02%. This indicates that SPMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPMOSCHPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.29%

1.02%

+9.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.73%

2.24%

+14.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.48%

3.30%

+16.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.65%

6.12%

+13.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.48%

5.59%

+14.89%

SPMO vs. SCHP - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPMO has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHP's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SPMO vs. SCHP - Dividend Comparison

SPMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, less than SCHP's 3.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCHP
Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF
3.99%4.06%2.99%3.02%7.19%4.39%1.11%2.02%2.26%1.90%1.38%0.28%
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
0.67%0.73%0.48%1.63%1.66%0.52%1.27%1.39%1.05%0.77%1.94%0.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPMO and SCHP have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPMO has higher volatility (10.29%) compared to SCHP (1.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPMO dropped -30.95% vs SCHP's -14.26%.

On 10-year performance, SPMO leads with 20.86% vs 2.60% for SCHP. On fees, SCHP is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SCHP has been the lower-risk option at 1.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPMO has performed better with a 20.86% return vs 2.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHP is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.13% for SPMO.

SCHP has the higher dividend yield at 3.99%, compared with 0.67% for SPMO.

SPMO is categorized as Momentum, while SCHP is Inflation-Protected Bonds. SPMO tracks S&P 500 Momentum Index, while SCHP tracks Bloomberg US Treasury Inflation-Linked Bond Index (Series-L). They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for SPMO and 0.03% for SCHP.

SPMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPMO and SCHP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer