SPMO vs. PTIR
SPMO (Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF) and PTIR (GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P 500 Momentum Index, while PTIR is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares. SPMO is passively managed, while PTIR is actively managed. Over the past year, SPMO returned 39.21% vs -30.45% for PTIR. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SPMO charges 0.13%/yr vs 1.15%/yr for PTIR.
Performance
SPMO vs. PTIR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPMO achieves a 23.98% return, which is significantly higher than PTIR's -53.83% return.
SPMO
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- 2.57%
- YTD
- 23.98%
- 6M
- 22.84%
- 1Y
- 39.21%
- 3Y*
- 40.17%
- 5Y*
- 22.76%
- 10Y*
- 20.35%
PTIR
- 1D
- -6.30%
- 1M
- -11.41%
- YTD
- -53.83%
- 6M
- -56.61%
- 1Y
- -30.45%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPMO vs. PTIR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 23.98% | 26.58% | 10.21% |
PTIR GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF | -53.83% | 221.36% | 425.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPMO and PTIR is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2024 | 0.54 |
The correlation between SPMO and PTIR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.
SPMO vs. PTIR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPMO
PTIR
Technology
Industrials
-
Communication Services
-
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
SPMO
PTIR
Industrials
SPMO
PTIR
-
Communication Services
SPMO
PTIR
-
Healthcare
SPMO
PTIR
-
Financial Services
SPMO
PTIR
-
Consumer Defensive
SPMO
PTIR
-
Energy
SPMO
PTIR
-
Utilities
SPMO
PTIR
-
Basic Materials
SPMO
PTIR
-
Consumer Cyclical
SPMO
PTIR
-
Real Estate
SPMO
PTIR
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPMO vs. PTIR — Risk / Return Rank
SPMO
PTIR
SPMO vs. PTIR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) and GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF (PTIR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPMO | PTIR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.03 | +0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.10 | -0.45 | +3.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.87 | -0.75 | +12.62 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPMO | PTIR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.11 | -0.30 | +2.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.17 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.00 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.98 | 1.72 | -0.75 |
Drawdowns
SPMO vs. PTIR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPMO drawdown since its inception was -30.95%, smaller than the maximum PTIR drawdown of -69.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPMO and PTIR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPMO | PTIR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.95% | -69.10% | +38.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.70% | -68.18% | +55.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.13% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.74% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.95% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.89% | -68.18% | +63.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.60% | -27.75% | +23.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.31% | 40.39% | -37.08% |
Volatility
SPMO vs. PTIR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) is 8.94%, while GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF (PTIR) has a volatility of 34.63%. This indicates that SPMO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PTIR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPMO | PTIR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.94% | 34.63% | -25.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.83% | 77.29% | -61.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.68% | 101.53% | -82.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.50% | 129.15% | -109.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.41% | 129.15% | -108.74% |
SPMO vs. PTIR - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPMO has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than PTIR's 1.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPMO vs. PTIR - Dividend Comparison
SPMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.69%, less than PTIR's 12.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PTIR GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF | 12.59% | 5.81% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.69% | 0.73% | 0.48% | 1.63% | 1.66% | 0.52% | 1.27% | 1.39% | 1.05% | 0.77% | 1.94% | 0.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPMO and PTIR have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PTIR has higher volatility (34.63%) compared to SPMO (8.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPMO dropped -30.95% vs PTIR's -69.10%.
On 1-year performance, SPMO leads with 39.21% vs -30.45% for PTIR. On fees, SPMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, SPMO has been the lower-risk option at 8.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SPMO has performed better with a 39.21% return vs -30.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for PTIR.
PTIR has the higher dividend yield at 12.59%, compared with 0.69% for SPMO.
SPMO is categorized as Momentum, while PTIR is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for SPMO and 1.15% for PTIR.
SPMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs -0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPMO and PTIR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer