PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPMO vs. PTF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPMO vs. PTF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) and Invesco Dorsey Wright Technology Momentum ETF (PTF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPMO achieves a 27.25% return, which is significantly lower than PTF's 41.44% return. Over the past 10 years, SPMO has underperformed PTF with an annualized return of 20.17%, while PTF has yielded a comparatively higher 23.35% annualized return.


SPMO

1D
4.00%
1M
0.23%
6M
27.03%
YTD
27.25%
1Y
32.27%
3Y*
39.98%
5Y*
20.99%
10Y*
20.17%
ALL TIME*
19.45%

PTF

1D
6.41%
1M
-4.61%
6M
23.32%
YTD
41.44%
1Y
53.98%
3Y*
30.70%
5Y*
16.16%
10Y*
23.35%
ALL TIME*
13.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$25.15M$20.80M$16.47M
$336.43M$343.89M$352.54M

SPMO vs. PTF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
27.25%26.58%45.82%17.56%-10.45%22.64%28.25%25.93%-0.92%27.76%
PTF
Invesco Dorsey Wright Technology Momentum ETF
41.44%5.68%43.65%33.73%-31.75%18.10%82.06%46.71%0.01%32.07%

Correlation

The correlation between SPMO and PTF is 0.84, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2015

0.70

The correlation between SPMO and PTF shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (all time) to 0.84 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SPMO vs. PTF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPMO
PTF

Technology

53.7%
94.7%

Industrials

11.2%
1.8%

Communication Services

7.4%
4.5%

Healthcare

6.9%

-

Financial Services

6.0%
0.8%

Consumer Defensive

4.2%

-

Energy

3.3%
1.6%

Utilities

2.7%

-

Basic Materials

1.9%

-

Consumer Cyclical

1.2%

-

Real Estate

1.1%

-

Technology

SPMO
53.7%
PTF
94.7%

Industrials

SPMO
11.2%
PTF
1.8%

Communication Services

SPMO
7.4%
PTF
4.5%

Healthcare

SPMO
6.9%
PTF

-

Financial Services

SPMO
6.0%
PTF
0.8%

Consumer Defensive

SPMO
4.2%
PTF

-

Energy

SPMO
3.3%
PTF
1.6%

Utilities

SPMO
2.7%
PTF

-

Basic Materials

SPMO
1.9%
PTF

-

Consumer Cyclical

SPMO
1.2%
PTF

-

Real Estate

SPMO
1.1%
PTF

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPMO vs. PTF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SPMO
SPMO Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
SPMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPMO Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
SPMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPMO Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

PTF
PTF Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
PTF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PTF Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
PTF Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
PTF Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
PTF Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SPMO vs. PTF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) and Invesco Dorsey Wright Technology Momentum ETF (PTF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPMOPTFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.21

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.07

1.41

+0.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.44

6.17

+1.27

SPMO vs. PTF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPMO Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is comparable to the PTF Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPMO and PTF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPMO vs. PTF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPMO drawdown since its inception was -30.95%, smaller than the maximum PTF drawdown of -55.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPMO and PTF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPMOPTFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.95%

-55.38%

+24.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.64%

-38.59%

+22.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.13%

-38.59%

+18.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.74%

-44.88%

+22.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.95%

-44.88%

+13.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.49%

-21.81%

+15.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.62%

-13.29%

+8.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.35%

8.81%

-4.46%

Volatility

SPMO vs. PTF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) is 10.95%, while Invesco Dorsey Wright Technology Momentum ETF (PTF) has a volatility of 27.09%. This indicates that SPMO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PTF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPMOPTFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.95%

27.09%

-16.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.85%

43.61%

-21.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.13%

51.31%

-27.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.69%

38.11%

-17.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.97%

34.66%

-13.69%

SPMO vs. PTF - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPMO has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than PTF's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPMO vs. PTF - Dividend Comparison

SPMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.69%, more than PTF's 0.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PTF
Invesco Dorsey Wright Technology Momentum ETF
0.01%0.21%0.00%0.07%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.08%0.04%0.26%0.00%
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
0.69%0.73%0.48%1.63%1.66%0.52%1.27%1.39%1.05%0.77%1.94%0.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPMO and PTF have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PTF has higher volatility (27.09%) compared to SPMO (10.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPMO dropped -30.95% vs PTF's -55.38%.

On 10-year performance, PTF leads with 23.35% vs 20.17% for SPMO. On fees, SPMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, SPMO has been the lower-risk option at 10.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PTF has performed better with a 23.35% return vs 20.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PTF.

SPMO has the higher dividend yield at 0.69%, compared with 0.01% for PTF.

SPMO tracks S&P 500 Momentum Index, while PTF tracks Dorsey Wright Technology Technical Leaders Index. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for SPMO and 0.60% for PTF.

SPMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.35 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPMO and PTF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer