SPMO vs. MAGS
SPMO (Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF) and MAGS (Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P 500 Momentum Index, while MAGS is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill. SPMO is passively managed, while MAGS is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, SPMO returned 40.17%/yr vs 32.58%/yr for MAGS. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SPMO charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for MAGS.
Performance
SPMO vs. MAGS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPMO achieves a 23.98% return, which is significantly higher than MAGS's -0.45% return.
SPMO
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- 2.57%
- YTD
- 23.98%
- 6M
- 22.84%
- 1Y
- 39.21%
- 3Y*
- 40.17%
- 5Y*
- 22.76%
- 10Y*
- 20.35%
MAGS
- 1D
- -1.31%
- 1M
- -5.69%
- YTD
- -0.45%
- 6M
- -0.80%
- 1Y
- 25.07%
- 3Y*
- 32.58%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPMO vs. MAGS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 23.98% | 26.58% | 45.82% | 18.71% |
MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF | -0.45% | 22.99% | 63.97% | 35.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPMO and MAGS is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2023 | 0.71 |
The correlation between SPMO and MAGS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.
SPMO vs. MAGS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPMO
MAGS
Technology
Industrials
-
Communication Services
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
-
Technology
SPMO
MAGS
Industrials
SPMO
MAGS
-
Communication Services
SPMO
MAGS
Healthcare
SPMO
MAGS
-
Financial Services
SPMO
MAGS
-
Consumer Defensive
SPMO
MAGS
-
Energy
SPMO
MAGS
-
Utilities
SPMO
MAGS
-
Basic Materials
SPMO
MAGS
-
Consumer Cyclical
SPMO
MAGS
Real Estate
SPMO
MAGS
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPMO vs. MAGS — Risk / Return Rank
SPMO
MAGS
SPMO vs. MAGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) and Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPMO | MAGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.86 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.22 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.10 | 1.35 | +1.75 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.87 | 4.64 | +7.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPMO | MAGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.11 | 1.25 | +0.86 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.17 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.00 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.98 | 1.44 | -0.47 |
Drawdowns
SPMO vs. MAGS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPMO drawdown since its inception was -30.95%, roughly equal to the maximum MAGS drawdown of -29.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPMO and MAGS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPMO | MAGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.95% | -29.91% | -1.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.70% | -18.62% | +5.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.13% | -29.91% | +9.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.74% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.95% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.89% | -7.44% | +2.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.60% | -4.70% | +0.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.31% | 5.42% | -2.11% |
Volatility
SPMO vs. MAGS - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) has a higher volatility of 8.94% compared to Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS) at 5.85%. This indicates that SPMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MAGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPMO | MAGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.94% | 5.85% | +3.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.83% | 14.90% | +0.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.68% | 20.23% | -1.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.50% | 25.98% | -6.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.41% | 25.98% | -5.57% |
SPMO vs. MAGS - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPMO has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than MAGS's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPMO vs. MAGS - Dividend Comparison
SPMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.69%, less than MAGS's 1.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF | 1.49% | 1.48% | 0.81% | 0.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.69% | 0.73% | 0.48% | 1.63% | 1.66% | 0.52% | 1.27% | 1.39% | 1.05% | 0.77% | 1.94% | 0.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPMO and MAGS have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPMO has higher volatility (8.94%) compared to MAGS (5.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPMO dropped -30.95% vs MAGS's -29.91%.
On 3-year performance, SPMO leads with 40.17% vs 32.58% for MAGS. On fees, SPMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, MAGS has been the lower-risk option at 5.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SPMO has performed better with a 40.17% return vs 32.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for MAGS.
MAGS has the higher dividend yield at 1.49%, compared with 0.69% for SPMO.
SPMO is categorized as Momentum, while MAGS is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for SPMO and 0.29% for MAGS.
SPMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPMO and MAGS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer