SPMO vs. LVHI
SPMO (Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF) and LVHI (Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P 500 Momentum Index, while LVHI is a Volatility Hedged Equity fund tracking the Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Hedged Index-NR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SPMO returned 23.50%/yr vs 15.97%/yr for LVHI. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SPMO charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for LVHI.
Performance
SPMO vs. LVHI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPMO achieves a 28.15% return, which is significantly higher than LVHI's 13.78% return.
SPMO
- 1D
- 1.26%
- 1M
- 4.23%
- YTD
- 28.15%
- 6M
- 28.70%
- 1Y
- 43.47%
- 3Y*
- 41.53%
- 5Y*
- 23.50%
- 10Y*
- 20.86%
LVHI
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- 1.30%
- YTD
- 13.78%
- 6M
- 14.96%
- 1Y
- 31.64%
- 3Y*
- 21.52%
- 5Y*
- 15.97%
- 10Y*
- —
SPMO vs. LVHI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 28.15% | 26.58% | 45.82% | 17.56% | -10.45% | 22.64% | 28.25% | 25.93% | -0.92% | 27.76% |
LVHI Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 13.78% | 27.12% | 14.81% | 17.45% | 3.84% | 18.19% | -8.76% | 18.35% | -5.22% | 12.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPMO and LVHI is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 2016 | 0.46 |
The correlation between SPMO and LVHI shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (1 year) to 0.50 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SPMO vs. LVHI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPMO
LVHI
Technology
Industrials
Communication Services
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Technology
SPMO
LVHI
Industrials
SPMO
LVHI
Communication Services
SPMO
LVHI
Healthcare
SPMO
LVHI
Financial Services
SPMO
LVHI
Consumer Defensive
SPMO
LVHI
Energy
SPMO
LVHI
Utilities
SPMO
LVHI
Basic Materials
SPMO
LVHI
Consumer Cyclical
SPMO
LVHI
Real Estate
SPMO
LVHI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPMO vs. LVHI — Risk / Return Rank
SPMO
LVHI
SPMO vs. LVHI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) and Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPMO | LVHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.63 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.44 | 5.23 | -1.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.01 | 21.61 | -8.61 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPMO vs. LVHI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPMO drawdown since its inception was -30.95%, roughly equal to the maximum LVHI drawdown of -32.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPMO and LVHI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPMO | LVHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.95% | -32.31% | +1.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.70% | -6.08% | -6.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.13% | -11.99% | -8.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.74% | -11.99% | -10.75% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.95% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.68% | 0.00% | -1.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.60% | -3.51% | -1.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.35% | 1.48% | +1.87% |
Volatility
SPMO vs. LVHI - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) has a higher volatility of 10.29% compared to Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI) at 2.78%. This indicates that SPMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LVHI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPMO | LVHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.29% | 2.78% | +7.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.73% | 7.72% | +9.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.48% | 9.60% | +9.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.65% | 11.08% | +8.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.48% | 13.75% | +6.73% |
SPMO vs. LVHI - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPMO has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than LVHI's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPMO vs. LVHI - Dividend Comparison
SPMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, less than LVHI's 4.69% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LVHI Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 4.69% | 4.92% | 3.98% | 8.12% | 7.74% | 4.13% | 3.97% | 6.67% | 10.67% | 3.38% | 2.02% | 0.00% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.67% | 0.73% | 0.48% | 1.63% | 1.66% | 0.52% | 1.27% | 1.39% | 1.05% | 0.77% | 1.94% | 0.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPMO and LVHI have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPMO has higher volatility (10.29%) compared to LVHI (2.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPMO dropped -30.95% vs LVHI's -32.31%.
On 5-year performance, SPMO leads with 23.50% vs 15.97% for LVHI. On fees, SPMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, LVHI has been the lower-risk option at 2.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SPMO has performed better with a 23.50% return vs 15.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for LVHI.
LVHI has the higher dividend yield at 4.69%, compared with 0.67% for SPMO.
SPMO is categorized as Momentum, while LVHI is Volatility Hedged Equity. SPMO tracks S&P 500 Momentum Index, while LVHI tracks Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Hedged Index-NR. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for SPMO and 0.40% for LVHI.
LVHI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.31 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPMO and LVHI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer