SPMO vs. FMTM
SPMO (Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF) and FMTM (MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF) are both Momentum funds. SPMO is passively managed, while FMTM is actively managed. Over the past year, SPMO returned 46.00% vs 63.62% for FMTM. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SPMO charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for FMTM.
Performance
SPMO vs. FMTM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SPMO having a 30.35% return and FMTM slightly higher at 31.75%.
SPMO
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- 15.36%
- YTD
- 30.35%
- 6M
- 30.51%
- 1Y
- 46.00%
- 3Y*
- 43.04%
- 5Y*
- 24.29%
- 10Y*
- 20.95%
FMTM
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- 6.28%
- YTD
- 31.75%
- 6M
- 34.74%
- 1Y
- 63.62%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPMO vs. FMTM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 30.35% | 27.43% |
FMTM MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF | 31.75% | 27.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPMO and FMTM is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2025 | 0.69 |
The correlation between SPMO and FMTM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPMO vs. FMTM — Risk / Return Rank
SPMO
FMTM
SPMO vs. FMTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) and MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF (FMTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPMO | FMTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.62 | 2.80 | -0.18 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.54 | 3.43 | +0.11 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.46 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.64 | 5.28 | -1.64 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.17 | 20.62 | -6.45 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPMO | FMTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.62 | 2.80 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.27 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.03 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.01 | 2.38 | -1.37 |
Drawdowns
SPMO vs. FMTM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPMO drawdown since its inception was -30.95%, which is greater than FMTM's maximum drawdown of -12.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPMO and FMTM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPMO | FMTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.95% | -12.12% | -18.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.70% | -12.12% | -0.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.13% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.74% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.95% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.60% | -1.89% | -2.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.26% | 3.10% | +0.16% |
Volatility
SPMO vs. FMTM - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) has a higher volatility of 7.35% compared to MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF (FMTM) at 6.52%. This indicates that SPMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FMTM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPMO | FMTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.35% | 6.52% | +0.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.39% | 17.83% | -3.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.64% | 22.82% | -5.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.30% | 22.94% | -3.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.31% | 22.94% | -2.63% |
SPMO vs. FMTM - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPMO has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than FMTM's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPMO vs. FMTM - Dividend Comparison
SPMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, more than FMTM's 0.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FMTM MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF | 0.22% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.65% | 0.73% | 0.48% | 1.63% | 1.66% | 0.52% | 1.27% | 1.39% | 1.05% | 0.77% | 1.94% | 0.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPMO and FMTM have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPMO has higher volatility (7.35%) compared to FMTM (6.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPMO dropped -30.95% vs FMTM's -12.12%.
On 1-year performance, FMTM leads with 63.62% vs 46.00% for SPMO. On fees, SPMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, FMTM has been the lower-risk option at 6.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, FMTM has performed better with a 63.62% return vs 46.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for FMTM.
SPMO has the higher dividend yield at 0.65%, compared with 0.22% for FMTM.
Their fees differ too: 0.13% for SPMO and 0.45% for FMTM.
FMTM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 2.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPMO and FMTM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer