PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPMO vs. FBND
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPMO vs. FBND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) and Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPMO achieves a 24.29% return, which is significantly higher than FBND's 0.10% return. Over the past 10 years, SPMO has outperformed FBND with an annualized return of 20.38%, while FBND has yielded a comparatively lower 2.47% annualized return.


SPMO

1D
2.50%
1M
2.83%
YTD
24.29%
6M
22.86%
1Y
39.53%
3Y*
40.28%
5Y*
23.06%
10Y*
20.38%

FBND

1D
-0.07%
1M
-0.69%
YTD
0.10%
6M
0.40%
1Y
5.34%
3Y*
4.60%
5Y*
0.68%
10Y*
2.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPMO vs. FBND - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
24.29%26.58%45.82%17.56%-10.45%22.64%28.25%25.93%-0.92%27.76%
FBND
Fidelity Total Bond ETF
0.10%7.57%2.13%6.81%-12.54%-0.43%9.41%9.82%-0.57%3.52%

Correlation

The correlation between SPMO and FBND is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2015

0.11

SPMO vs. FBND - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPMO
FBND

Technology

54.8%

-

Industrials

10.9%
71.4%

Communication Services

8.7%

-

Healthcare

6.2%

-

Financial Services

5.7%
0.2%

Consumer Defensive

4.0%

-

Energy

3.1%
1.1%

Utilities

2.5%
27.5%

Basic Materials

1.6%

-

Consumer Cyclical

1.3%

-

Real Estate

0.9%

-

Technology

SPMO
54.8%
FBND

-

Industrials

SPMO
10.9%
FBND
71.4%

Communication Services

SPMO
8.7%
FBND

-

Healthcare

SPMO
6.2%
FBND

-

Financial Services

SPMO
5.7%
FBND
0.2%

Consumer Defensive

SPMO
4.0%
FBND

-

Energy

SPMO
3.1%
FBND
1.1%

Utilities

SPMO
2.5%
FBND
27.5%

Basic Materials

SPMO
1.6%
FBND

-

Consumer Cyclical

SPMO
1.3%
FBND

-

Real Estate

SPMO
0.9%
FBND

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPMO vs. FBND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPMO
SPMO Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
SPMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPMO Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
SPMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPMO Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

FBND
FBND Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
FBND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBND Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBND Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
FBND Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBND Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPMO vs. FBND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) and Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPMOFBNDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.25

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.13

2.01

+1.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.02

5.97

+6.05

SPMO vs. FBND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPMO Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is higher than the FBND Sharpe Ratio of 1.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPMO and FBND, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPMOFBNDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.13

1.41

+0.71

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.19

0.12

+1.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.00

0.41

+0.60

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.98

0.44

+0.54

Drawdowns

SPMO vs. FBND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPMO drawdown since its inception was -30.95%, which is greater than FBND's maximum drawdown of -17.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPMO and FBND.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPMOFBNDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.95%

-17.25%

-13.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.70%

-2.66%

-10.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.13%

-5.94%

-14.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.74%

-17.25%

-5.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.95%

-17.25%

-13.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.65%

-1.82%

-2.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.60%

-3.35%

-1.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.30%

0.90%

+2.40%

Volatility

SPMO vs. FBND - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) has a higher volatility of 9.44% compared to Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND) at 1.23%. This indicates that SPMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPMOFBNDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.44%

1.23%

+8.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.82%

2.75%

+13.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.72%

3.80%

+14.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.50%

5.92%

+13.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.41%

6.10%

+14.31%

SPMO vs. FBND - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPMO has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than FBND's 0.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPMO vs. FBND - Dividend Comparison

SPMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.69%, less than FBND's 4.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FBND
Fidelity Total Bond ETF
4.72%4.70%4.73%4.26%3.07%1.86%4.25%2.90%2.93%2.56%2.84%3.26%
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
0.69%0.73%0.48%1.63%1.66%0.52%1.27%1.39%1.05%0.77%1.94%0.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPMO and FBND have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPMO has higher volatility (9.44%) compared to FBND (1.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPMO dropped -30.95% vs FBND's -17.25%.

On 10-year performance, SPMO leads with 20.38% vs 2.47% for FBND. On fees, SPMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, FBND has been the lower-risk option at 1.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPMO has performed better with a 20.38% return vs 2.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for FBND.

FBND has the higher dividend yield at 4.72%, compared with 0.69% for SPMO.

SPMO is categorized as Momentum, while FBND is Intermediate Core-Plus Bond. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for SPMO and 0.36% for FBND.

SPMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPMO and FBND

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer