PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPMO vs. FBALX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPMO vs. FBALX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) and Fidelity Balanced Fund (FBALX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPMO achieves a 24.29% return, which is significantly higher than FBALX's 7.96% return. Over the past 10 years, SPMO has outperformed FBALX with an annualized return of 20.38%, while FBALX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.48% annualized return.


SPMO

1D
2.50%
1M
2.83%
YTD
24.29%
6M
22.86%
1Y
39.53%
3Y*
40.28%
5Y*
23.06%
10Y*
20.38%

FBALX

1D
-2.10%
1M
-0.35%
YTD
7.96%
6M
8.36%
1Y
21.65%
3Y*
15.93%
5Y*
8.87%
10Y*
11.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPMO vs. FBALX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
24.29%26.58%45.82%17.56%-10.45%22.64%28.25%25.93%-0.92%27.76%
FBALX
Fidelity Balanced Fund
7.96%15.11%16.09%20.31%-18.29%18.27%22.45%24.40%-3.98%16.52%

Correlation

The correlation between SPMO and FBALX is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2015

0.76

The correlation between SPMO and FBALX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPMO vs. FBALX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPMO
SPMO Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
SPMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPMO Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
SPMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPMO Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

FBALX
FBALX Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
FBALX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBALX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBALX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
FBALX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBALX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPMO vs. FBALX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) and Fidelity Balanced Fund (FBALX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPMOFBALXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.48

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.13

3.46

-0.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.02

16.47

-4.45

SPMO vs. FBALX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPMO Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is comparable to the FBALX Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPMO and FBALX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPMOFBALXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.13

2.52

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.19

0.73

+0.46

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.00

0.90

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.98

0.81

+0.17

Drawdowns

SPMO vs. FBALX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPMO drawdown since its inception was -30.95%, smaller than the maximum FBALX drawdown of -43.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPMO and FBALX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPMOFBALXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.95%

-43.57%

+12.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.70%

-6.47%

-6.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.13%

-12.88%

-7.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.74%

-22.89%

+0.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.95%

-26.68%

-4.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.65%

-2.12%

-2.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.60%

-4.37%

-0.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.30%

1.35%

+1.95%

Volatility

SPMO vs. FBALX - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) has a higher volatility of 9.44% compared to Fidelity Balanced Fund (FBALX) at 3.23%. This indicates that SPMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBALX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPMOFBALXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.44%

3.23%

+6.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.82%

7.15%

+8.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.72%

8.87%

+9.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.50%

12.21%

+7.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.41%

12.79%

+7.62%

SPMO vs. FBALX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPMO has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than FBALX's 0.46% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPMO vs. FBALX - Dividend Comparison

SPMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.69%, less than FBALX's 5.25% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FBALX
Fidelity Balanced Fund
5.25%5.69%5.67%2.28%8.06%9.66%5.90%4.24%10.99%7.90%3.07%7.70%
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
0.69%0.73%0.48%1.63%1.66%0.52%1.27%1.39%1.05%0.77%1.94%0.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPMO and FBALX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPMO has higher volatility (9.44%) compared to FBALX (3.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPMO dropped -30.95% vs FBALX's -43.57%.

FBALX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 2.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPMO and FBALX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer