PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPMO vs. ETHA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPMO vs. ETHA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) and iShares Ethereum Trust ETF (ETHA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPMO achieves a 28.15% return, which is significantly higher than ETHA's -43.96% return.


SPMO

1D
1.26%
1M
3.36%
YTD
28.15%
6M
28.70%
1Y
44.90%
3Y*
41.53%
5Y*
23.50%
10Y*
20.86%

ETHA

1D
-1.02%
1M
-27.59%
YTD
-43.96%
6M
-45.98%
1Y
-34.33%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPMO vs. ETHA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
28.15%26.58%8.71%
ETHA
iShares Ethereum Trust ETF
-43.96%-11.31%-4.89%

Correlation

The correlation between SPMO and ETHA is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2024

0.47

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPMO vs. ETHA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPMO
SPMO Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
SPMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPMO Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
SPMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPMO Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

ETHA
ETHA Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
ETHA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETHA Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETHA Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
ETHA Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETHA Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPMO vs. ETHA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) and iShares Ethereum Trust ETF (ETHA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPMOETHADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

0.94

+0.47

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.44

-0.57

+4.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.01

-0.98

+13.99

SPMO vs. ETHA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPMO Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is higher than the ETHA Sharpe Ratio of -0.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPMO and ETHA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPMO vs. ETHA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPMO drawdown since its inception was -30.95%, smaller than the maximum ETHA drawdown of -67.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPMO and ETHA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPMOETHADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.95%

-67.56%

+36.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.70%

-67.56%

+54.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.68%

-65.65%

+63.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.60%

-33.25%

+28.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.35%

39.22%

-35.87%

Volatility

SPMO vs. ETHA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) is 10.29%, while iShares Ethereum Trust ETF (ETHA) has a volatility of 17.30%. This indicates that SPMO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ETHA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPMOETHADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.29%

17.30%

-7.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.73%

46.58%

-29.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.48%

69.29%

-49.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.65%

72.65%

-53.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.48%

72.65%

-52.17%

SPMO vs. ETHA - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPMO has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than ETHA's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SPMO vs. ETHA - Dividend Comparison

SPMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, while ETHA has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ETHA
iShares Ethereum Trust ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
0.67%0.73%0.48%1.63%1.66%0.52%1.27%1.39%1.05%0.77%1.94%0.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPMO and ETHA have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ETHA has higher volatility (17.30%) compared to SPMO (10.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPMO dropped -30.95% vs ETHA's -67.56%.

On 1-year performance, SPMO leads with 44.90% vs -34.33% for ETHA. On fees, SPMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, SPMO has been the lower-risk option at 10.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SPMO has performed better with a 44.90% return vs -34.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for ETHA.

SPMO has the higher dividend yield at 0.67%, compared with 0.00% for ETHA.

SPMO is categorized as Momentum, while ETHA is Cryptocurrency. SPMO tracks S&P 500 Momentum Index, while ETHA tracks CME CF Ether Dollar Reference Rate - New York Variant. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for SPMO and 0.25% for ETHA.

SPMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs -0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPMO and ETHA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer