SPMO vs. DFEV
SPMO (Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF) and DFEV (Dimensional Emerging Markets Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P 500 Momentum Index, while DFEV is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund actively managed by Dimensional. SPMO is passively managed, while DFEV is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, SPMO returned 40.28%/yr vs 22.74%/yr for DFEV. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SPMO charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.43%/yr for DFEV.
Performance
SPMO vs. DFEV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPMO achieves a 24.29% return, which is significantly higher than DFEV's 22.81% return.
SPMO
- 1D
- 2.50%
- 1M
- 2.83%
- YTD
- 24.29%
- 6M
- 22.86%
- 1Y
- 39.53%
- 3Y*
- 40.28%
- 5Y*
- 23.06%
- 10Y*
- 20.38%
DFEV
- 1D
- 1.62%
- 1M
- -2.01%
- YTD
- 22.81%
- 6M
- 25.32%
- 1Y
- 46.17%
- 3Y*
- 22.74%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPMO vs. DFEV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 24.29% | 26.58% | 45.82% | 17.56% | 1.33% |
DFEV Dimensional Emerging Markets Value ETF | 22.81% | 32.54% | 7.26% | 15.52% | -6.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPMO and DFEV is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2022 | 0.57 |
The correlation between SPMO and DFEV shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (3 years) to 0.66 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SPMO vs. DFEV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPMO
DFEV
Technology
Industrials
Communication Services
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Technology
SPMO
DFEV
Industrials
SPMO
DFEV
Communication Services
SPMO
DFEV
Healthcare
SPMO
DFEV
Financial Services
SPMO
DFEV
Consumer Defensive
SPMO
DFEV
Energy
SPMO
DFEV
Utilities
SPMO
DFEV
Basic Materials
SPMO
DFEV
Consumer Cyclical
SPMO
DFEV
Real Estate
SPMO
DFEV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPMO vs. DFEV — Risk / Return Rank
SPMO
DFEV
SPMO vs. DFEV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) and Dimensional Emerging Markets Value ETF (DFEV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPMO | DFEV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.47 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.13 | 4.09 | -0.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.02 | 15.04 | -3.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPMO | DFEV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.13 | 2.52 | -0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.19 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.00 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.98 | 1.00 | -0.02 |
Drawdowns
SPMO vs. DFEV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPMO drawdown since its inception was -30.95%, which is greater than DFEV's maximum drawdown of -18.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPMO and DFEV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPMO | DFEV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.95% | -18.49% | -12.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.70% | -11.35% | -1.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.13% | -17.94% | -2.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.74% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.95% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.65% | -6.42% | +1.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.60% | -4.65% | +0.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.30% | 3.08% | +0.22% |
Volatility
SPMO vs. DFEV - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) and Dimensional Emerging Markets Value ETF (DFEV) have volatilities of 9.44% and 9.67%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPMO | DFEV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.44% | 9.67% | -0.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.82% | 16.20% | -0.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.72% | 18.42% | +0.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.50% | 16.68% | +2.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.41% | 16.68% | +3.73% |
SPMO vs. DFEV - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPMO has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than DFEV's 0.43% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPMO vs. DFEV - Dividend Comparison
SPMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.69%, less than DFEV's 2.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFEV Dimensional Emerging Markets Value ETF | 2.13% | 2.69% | 3.17% | 3.47% | 3.35% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.69% | 0.73% | 0.48% | 1.63% | 1.66% | 0.52% | 1.27% | 1.39% | 1.05% | 0.77% | 1.94% | 0.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPMO and DFEV have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DFEV has higher volatility (9.67%) compared to SPMO (9.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPMO dropped -30.95% vs DFEV's -18.49%.
On 3-year performance, SPMO leads with 40.28% vs 22.74% for DFEV. On fees, SPMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, SPMO has been the lower-risk option at 9.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SPMO has performed better with a 40.28% return vs 22.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for DFEV.
DFEV has the higher dividend yield at 2.13%, compared with 0.69% for SPMO.
SPMO is categorized as Momentum, while DFEV is Emerging Markets Diversified. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Dimensional. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for SPMO and 0.43% for DFEV.
DFEV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 2.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPMO and DFEV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer