PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
SPMD vs. SPGM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

SPMD vs. SPGM

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

SPMD (SPDR Portfolio S&P 400 Mid Cap ETF) and SPGM (SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPMD is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Index, while SPGM is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI AC World IMI. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPMD returned 11.34%/yr vs 12.87%/yr for SPGM. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SPMD charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for SPGM.

Performance

SPMD vs. SPGM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Portfolio S&P 400 Mid Cap ETF (SPMD) and SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF (SPGM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPMD achieves a 12.58% return, which is significantly higher than SPGM's 10.56% return. Over the past 10 years, SPMD has underperformed SPGM with an annualized return of 11.34%, while SPGM has yielded a comparatively higher 12.87% annualized return.

SPMD

1D
0.23%
1M
0.17%
YTD
12.58%
6M
12.81%
1Y
22.99%
3Y*
15.03%
5Y*
7.88%
10Y*
11.34%

SPGM

1D
0.49%
1M
-0.04%
YTD
10.56%
6M
11.22%
1Y
28.07%
3Y*
20.37%
5Y*
11.03%
10Y*
12.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPMD vs. SPGM - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPMD
SPDR Portfolio S&P 400 Mid Cap ETF		12.58%7.44%13.91%16.48%-13.13%24.76%13.46%25.19%-10.34%15.12%
SPGM
SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF		10.56%23.62%16.75%21.34%-17.53%21.13%15.28%26.58%-10.12%23.26%

Correlation

The correlation between SPMD and SPGM is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 5, 2012

0.72

The correlation between SPMD and SPGM shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (all time) to 0.87 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

SPDR Portfolio S&P 400 Mid Cap ETF

SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF

Often compared with SPMD:
SPMD vs. MDYSPMD vs. VOSPMD vs. SPYSPMD vs. SCHMSPMD vs. IWRSPMD vs. IMCBSPMD vs. SWMCX
Often compared with SPGM:
SPGM vs. VTSPGM vs. VOOSPGM vs. VXUSSPGM vs. CWISPGM vs. QWLDSPGM vs. SWRD.ASSPGM vs. SPGP

Return for Risk

SPMD vs. SPGM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
SPMD
SPMD Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
SPMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPMD Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
SPMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPMD Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
SPGM
SPGM Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
SPGM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPGM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPGM Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
SPGM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPGM Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPMD vs. SPGM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio S&P 400 Mid Cap ETF (SPMD) and SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF (SPGM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

SPMDSPGMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.48
2.13

-0.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.17
2.87

-0.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.39

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.61

2.97

-0.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.55

13.29

-3.74

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SPMD vs. SPGM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPMD Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is lower than the SPGM Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPMD and SPGM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

SPMDSPGMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.48

2.13

-0.65

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

0.69

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

0.73

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.65

-0.20

Drawdowns

SPMD vs. SPGM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPMD drawdown since its inception was -57.62%, which is greater than SPGM's maximum drawdown of -33.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPMD and SPGM.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

SPMDSPGMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.62%

-33.97%

-23.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.86%

-9.50%

+0.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.08%

-16.90%

-7.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.08%

-25.93%

+1.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.86%

-33.97%

-7.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.71%

-2.90%

+1.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.12%

-4.80%

-3.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.41%

2.12%

+0.29%

Volatility

SPMD vs. SPGM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Portfolio S&P 400 Mid Cap ETF (SPMD) is 4.16%, while SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF (SPGM) has a volatility of 4.59%. This indicates that SPMD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPGM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

SPMDSPGMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.16%

4.59%

-0.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.53%

10.85%

+0.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.66%

13.28%

+2.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.71%

16.09%

+3.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.19%

17.60%

+3.59%

SPMD vs. SPGM - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPMD has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than SPGM's 0.09% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

SPMD vs. SPGM - Dividend Comparison

SPMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%, less than SPGM's 1.83% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPGM
SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF		1.83%1.89%1.98%2.09%2.37%1.94%1.45%2.46%1.89%2.29%1.87%3.70%
SPMD
SPDR Portfolio S&P 400 Mid Cap ETF		1.24%1.39%1.42%1.47%1.64%1.24%1.30%1.57%1.85%1.97%2.13%5.33%

Frequently Asked Questions

SPMD and SPGM have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPGM has higher volatility (4.59%) compared to SPMD (4.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPMD dropped -57.62% vs SPGM's -33.97%.

On 10-year performance, SPGM leads with 12.87% vs 11.34% for SPMD. On fees, SPMD is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, SPMD has been the lower-risk option at 4.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPGM has performed better with a 12.87% return vs 11.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPMD is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for SPGM.

SPGM has the higher dividend yield at 1.83%, compared with 1.24% for SPMD.

SPMD is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while SPGM is Global Equities. SPMD tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index, while SPGM tracks MSCI AC World IMI. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for SPMD and 0.09% for SPGM.

SPGM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPMD and SPGM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer