SPMD vs. SIVR
SPMD (SPDR Portfolio S&P 400 Mid Cap ETF) and SIVR (abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPMD is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Index, while SIVR is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price ($/ozt). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPMD returned 11.85%/yr vs 14.57%/yr for SIVR. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SPMD charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for SIVR.
Performance
SPMD vs. SIVR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPMD achieves a 15.96% return, which is significantly higher than SIVR's -1.40% return. Over the past 10 years, SPMD has underperformed SIVR with an annualized return of 11.85%, while SIVR has yielded a comparatively higher 14.57% annualized return.
SPMD
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- 5.72%
- YTD
- 15.96%
- 6M
- 14.71%
- 1Y
- 28.46%
- 3Y*
- 15.58%
- 5Y*
- 8.72%
- 10Y*
- 11.85%
SIVR
- 1D
- 3.51%
- 1M
- -8.06%
- YTD
- -1.40%
- 6M
- 9.35%
- 1Y
- 92.86%
- 3Y*
- 42.25%
- 5Y*
- 20.46%
- 10Y*
- 14.57%
SPMD vs. SIVR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPMD SPDR Portfolio S&P 400 Mid Cap ETF | 15.96% | 7.44% | 13.91% | 16.48% | -13.13% | 24.76% | 13.46% | 25.19% | -10.34% | 15.12% |
SIVR abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF | -1.40% | 145.34% | 21.08% | -0.91% | 2.59% | -12.33% | 47.52% | 15.17% | -8.96% | 5.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPMD and SIVR is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2009 | 0.20 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPMD vs. SIVR — Risk / Return Rank
SPMD
SIVR
SPMD vs. SIVR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio S&P 400 Mid Cap ETF (SPMD) and abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPMD | SIVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.31 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.23 | 2.06 | +1.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.84 | 4.44 | +7.40 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPMD vs. SIVR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPMD drawdown since its inception was -57.62%, smaller than the maximum SIVR drawdown of -75.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPMD and SIVR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPMD | SIVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.62% | -75.85% | +18.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.86% | -45.33% | +36.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.08% | -45.33% | +21.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.08% | -45.33% | +21.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.86% | -45.33% | +3.47% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -39.85% | +39.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.11% | -47.83% | +39.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.41% | 21.00% | -18.59% |
Volatility
SPMD vs. SIVR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR Portfolio S&P 400 Mid Cap ETF (SPMD) is 5.07%, while abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) has a volatility of 16.52%. This indicates that SPMD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SIVR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPMD | SIVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.07% | 16.52% | -11.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.74% | 59.14% | -47.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.86% | 59.96% | -44.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.75% | 36.53% | -16.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.20% | 32.05% | -10.85% |
SPMD vs. SIVR - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPMD has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than SIVR's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPMD vs. SIVR - Dividend Comparison
SPMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%, while SIVR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SIVR abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPMD SPDR Portfolio S&P 400 Mid Cap ETF | 1.21% | 1.39% | 1.42% | 1.47% | 1.64% | 1.24% | 1.30% | 1.57% | 1.85% | 1.97% | 2.13% | 5.33% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPMD and SIVR have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SIVR has higher volatility (16.52%) compared to SPMD (5.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPMD dropped -57.62% vs SIVR's -75.85%.
On 10-year performance, SIVR leads with 14.57% vs 11.85% for SPMD. On fees, SPMD is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, SPMD has been the lower-risk option at 5.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SIVR has performed better with a 14.57% return vs 11.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPMD is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for SIVR.
SPMD has the higher dividend yield at 1.21%, compared with 0.00% for SIVR.
SPMD is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while SIVR is Silver. SPMD tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index, while SIVR tracks LBMA Silver Price ($/ozt). They also come from different issuers: State Street and abrdn. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for SPMD and 0.30% for SIVR.
SPMD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPMD and SIVR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer