PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPMD.L vs. IGLN.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPMD.L vs. IGLN.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (SPMD.L) and iShares Physical Gold ETC (IGLN.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPMD.L achieves a 4.17% return, which is significantly higher than IGLN.L's 3.70% return.


SPMD.L

1D
0.15%
1M
3.76%
YTD
4.17%
6M
5.47%
1Y
11.38%
3Y*
13.82%
5Y*
8.91%
10Y*

IGLN.L

1D
0.68%
1M
-2.35%
YTD
3.70%
6M
6.03%
1Y
32.37%
3Y*
31.55%
5Y*
18.61%
10Y*
13.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPMD.L vs. IGLN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
SPMD.L
iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
4.17%11.56%18.70%9.87%-10.96%24.92%7.60%30.93%-4.56%
IGLN.L
iShares Physical Gold ETC
3.70%64.92%26.14%13.44%-0.09%-4.03%24.16%18.28%-3.61%

Correlation

The correlation between SPMD.L and IGLN.L is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2018

0.13

The correlation between SPMD.L and IGLN.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (all time) to 0.30 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPMD.L vs. IGLN.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPMD.L
SPMD.L Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
SPMD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPMD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPMD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
SPMD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPMD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

IGLN.L
IGLN.L Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
IGLN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGLN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGLN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
IGLN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGLN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPMD.L vs. IGLN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (SPMD.L) and iShares Physical Gold ETC (IGLN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPMD.LIGLN.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.25

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.82

1.86

-0.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.13

4.79

+2.33

SPMD.L vs. IGLN.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPMD.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is comparable to the IGLN.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPMD.L and IGLN.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPMD.LIGLN.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.36

1.30

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

1.07

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.71

0.46

+0.25

Drawdowns

SPMD.L vs. IGLN.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPMD.L drawdown since its inception was -33.34%, smaller than the maximum IGLN.L drawdown of -45.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPMD.L and IGLN.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPMD.LIGLN.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.34%

-45.24%

+11.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.23%

-17.36%

+11.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.11%

-17.36%

+5.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.68%

-21.15%

+2.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-15.66%

+15.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.20%

-19.80%

+15.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.59%

6.74%

-5.15%

Volatility

SPMD.L vs. IGLN.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (SPMD.L) is 2.06%, while iShares Physical Gold ETC (IGLN.L) has a volatility of 6.36%. This indicates that SPMD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IGLN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPMD.LIGLN.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.06%

6.36%

-4.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.98%

21.73%

-15.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.35%

24.78%

-16.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.56%

17.36%

-4.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.63%

15.54%

-0.91%

SPMD.L vs. IGLN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPMD.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than IGLN.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SPMD.L vs. IGLN.L - Dividend Comparison

SPMD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%, while IGLN.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
IGLN.L
iShares Physical Gold ETC
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPMD.L
iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
1.16%1.15%1.28%1.46%1.35%1.27%1.54%1.52%1.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPMD.L and IGLN.L have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SPMD.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPMD.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IGLN.L.

SPMD.L is categorized as S&P 500, while IGLN.L is Gold. SPMD.L tracks S&P 500 Minimum Volatility Index, while IGLN.L tracks LBMA Gold Price. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SPMD.L and 0.25% for IGLN.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPMD.L and IGLN.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer