SPMB vs. SHM

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR Portfolio Mortgage Backed Bond ETF (SPMB) and SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays Short Term Municipal Bond ETF (SHM).

SPMB and SHM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SPMB is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US Aggregate Securitized - MBS. It was launched on Jan 15, 2009. SHM is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Municipal Managed Money Short. It was launched on Oct 10, 2007. Both SPMB and SHM are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

SPMB vs. SHM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Portfolio Mortgage Backed Bond ETF (SPMB) and SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays Short Term Municipal Bond ETF (SHM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

SPMB vs. SHM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SPMB SPDR Portfolio Mortgage Backed Bond ETF	0.51%	8.29%	1.35%	5.09%	-12.05%	-1.46%	4.19%	6.16%	1.01%	2.13%
SHM SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays Short Term Municipal Bond ETF	0.11%	3.95%	1.22%	2.92%	-3.82%	-0.37%	2.65%	3.64%	1.56%	0.99%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPMB achieves a 0.51% return, which is significantly higher than SHM's 0.11% return. Over the past 10 years, SPMB has outperformed SHM with an annualized return of 1.29%, while SHM has yielded a comparatively lower 1.16% annualized return.

SPMB

• 1D: 0.31%
• 1M: -1.58%
• YTD: 0.51%
• 6M: 1.98%
• 1Y: 5.73%
• 3Y*: 4.11%
• 5Y*: 0.37%
• 10Y*: 1.29%

SHM

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: -1.01%
• YTD: 0.11%
• 6M: 0.53%
• 1Y: 3.17%
• 3Y*: 2.26%
• 5Y*: 0.83%
• 10Y*: 1.16%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPMB vs. SHM - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPMB has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than SHM's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

SHM

SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays Short Term Municipal Bond ETF

SPMB

SPDR Portfolio Mortgage Backed Bond ETF

Return for Risk

SPMB vs. SHM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPMB

SPMB Risk / Return Rank: 66
SPMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
SPMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
SPMB Omega Ratio Rank: 59
SPMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
SPMB Martin Ratio Rank: 60

SHM

SHM Risk / Return Rank: 81
SHM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
SHM Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
SHM Omega Ratio Rank: 93
SHM Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
SHM Martin Ratio Rank: 64

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPMB vs. SHM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio Mortgage Backed Bond ETF (SPMB) and SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays Short Term Municipal Bond ETF (SHM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SPMB	SHM	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.18	1.74	-0.56
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.69	2.20	-0.51
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.42	-0.21
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.01	1.97	+0.03
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.76	6.17	-0.41
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SPMB vs. SHM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPMB Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is lower than the SHM Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPMB and SHM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SPMB	SHM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.18	1.74	-0.56
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.05	0.41	-0.35
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.17	0.35	-0.18
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.34	0.47	-0.13

Correlation

The correlation between SPMB and SHM is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

SPMB vs. SHM - Dividend Comparison

SPMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.02%, more than SHM's 2.64% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SPMB SPDR Portfolio Mortgage Backed Bond ETF	4.02%	3.98%	3.76%	3.21%	2.98%	2.59%	2.95%	3.24%	3.36%	3.13%	2.99%	3.05%
SHM SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays Short Term Municipal Bond ETF	2.64%	2.61%	2.06%	1.15%	0.69%	0.86%	1.24%	1.40%	1.23%	1.06%	0.94%	0.92%

Drawdowns

SPMB vs. SHM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPMB drawdown since its inception was -18.03%, which is greater than SHM's maximum drawdown of -11.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPMB and SHM.

Drawdown Indicators

	SPMB	SHM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.03%	-11.61%	-6.42%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.93%	-1.67%	-1.26%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.49%	-6.67%	-10.82%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-18.03%	-11.61%	-6.42%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.58%	-1.03%	-0.55%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.87%	-0.97%	-1.90%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.02%	0.53%	+0.49%

Volatility

SPMB vs. SHM - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Portfolio Mortgage Backed Bond ETF (SPMB) has a higher volatility of 1.83% compared to SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays Short Term Municipal Bond ETF (SHM) at 0.53%. This indicates that SPMB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SHM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SPMB	SHM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.83%	0.53%	+1.30%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.77%	0.89%	+1.88%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.88%	1.83%	+3.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.73%	2.07%	+4.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.59%	3.31%	+4.28%