PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPLV vs. XLP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPLV vs. XLP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF (SPLV) and State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPLV achieves a 5.23% return, which is significantly lower than XLP's 11.10% return. Over the past 10 years, SPLV has outperformed XLP with an annualized return of 8.36%, while XLP has yielded a comparatively lower 7.60% annualized return.


SPLV

1D
0.85%
1M
2.60%
YTD
5.23%
6M
5.17%
1Y
4.10%
3Y*
8.60%
5Y*
6.12%
10Y*
8.36%

XLP

1D
0.65%
1M
1.30%
YTD
11.10%
6M
9.54%
1Y
7.61%
3Y*
8.26%
5Y*
6.65%
10Y*
7.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPLV vs. XLP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPLV
Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF
5.23%4.10%13.93%0.53%-4.88%24.13%-1.39%27.87%-0.19%17.32%
XLP
State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF
11.10%1.52%12.20%-0.82%-0.81%17.20%10.11%27.43%-8.07%12.98%

Correlation

The correlation between SPLV and XLP is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2011

0.83

The correlation between SPLV and XLP shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (1 year) to 0.83 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SPLV vs. XLP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPLV
XLP

Utilities

26.8%

-

Financial Services

16.6%

-

Real Estate

14.8%

-

Consumer Defensive

10.8%
99.0%

Industrials

10.1%

-

Healthcare

6.8%

-

Consumer Cyclical

5.7%
1.0%

Technology

4.6%

-

Basic Materials

2.0%

-

Energy

0.9%

-

Communication Services

0.9%

-

Utilities

SPLV
26.8%
XLP

-

Financial Services

SPLV
16.6%
XLP

-

Real Estate

SPLV
14.8%
XLP

-

Consumer Defensive

SPLV
10.8%
XLP
99.0%

Industrials

SPLV
10.1%
XLP

-

Healthcare

SPLV
6.8%
XLP

-

Consumer Cyclical

SPLV
5.7%
XLP
1.0%

Technology

SPLV
4.6%
XLP

-

Basic Materials

SPLV
2.0%
XLP

-

Energy

SPLV
0.9%
XLP

-

Communication Services

SPLV
0.9%
XLP

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPLV vs. XLP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPLV
SPLV Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
SPLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPLV Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
SPLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPLV Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

XLP
XLP Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
XLP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLP Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLP Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
XLP Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLP Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPLV vs. XLP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF (SPLV) and State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPLVXLPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.11

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.56

0.79

-0.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.31

1.52

-0.21

SPLV vs. XLP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPLV Sharpe Ratio is 0.41, which is lower than the XLP Sharpe Ratio of 0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPLV and XLP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPLV vs. XLP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPLV drawdown since its inception was -36.26%, roughly equal to the maximum XLP drawdown of -35.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPLV and XLP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPLVXLPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.26%

-35.90%

-0.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.41%

-9.69%

+2.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.64%

-12.39%

+2.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.26%

-16.30%

-0.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.26%

-24.51%

-11.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.31%

-4.12%

+0.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.55%

-7.06%

+3.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.15%

5.01%

-1.86%

Volatility

SPLV vs. XLP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF (SPLV) is 4.01%, while State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP) has a volatility of 4.53%. This indicates that SPLV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPLVXLPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.01%

4.53%

-0.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.23%

10.14%

-2.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.14%

12.90%

-2.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.50%

13.34%

-0.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.38%

14.75%

+0.63%

SPLV vs. XLP - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPLV has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than XLP's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SPLV vs. XLP - Dividend Comparison

SPLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.14%, less than XLP's 2.53% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPLV
Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF
2.14%2.04%1.88%2.45%2.11%1.51%2.12%2.08%2.18%2.03%2.03%2.28%
XLP
State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF
2.53%2.75%2.77%2.63%2.47%2.28%2.50%2.57%3.04%2.62%2.53%2.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPLV and XLP have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XLP has higher volatility (4.53%) compared to SPLV (4.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPLV dropped -36.26% vs XLP's -35.90%.

On 10-year performance, SPLV leads with 8.36% vs 7.60% for XLP. On fees, XLP is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, SPLV has been the lower-risk option at 4.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPLV has performed better with a 8.36% return vs 7.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLP is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for SPLV.

XLP has the higher dividend yield at 2.53%, compared with 2.14% for SPLV.

SPLV is categorized as S&P 500, while XLP is Consumer Staples Equities. SPLV tracks S&P 500 Low Volatility Index, while XLP tracks Consumer Staples Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for SPLV and 0.08% for XLP.

XLP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.59 vs 0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPLV and XLP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer