PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPLV vs. SPMV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPLV vs. SPMV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF (SPLV) and Invesco S&P 500 Minimum Variance ETF (SPMV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


SPLV

1D
0.08%
1M
-2.50%
YTD
1.32%
6M
1.06%
1Y
-0.03%
3Y*
7.54%
5Y*
5.33%
10Y*
8.01%

SPMV

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPLV vs. SPMV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPLV
Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF
1.32%4.10%13.93%0.53%-4.88%24.13%-1.39%27.87%-0.19%6.41%
SPMV
Invesco S&P 500 Minimum Variance ETF
0.87%11.69%18.78%10.28%-10.84%24.35%8.57%32.13%-6.28%7.84%

Correlation

The correlation between SPLV and SPMV is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2017

0.72

Over the past year, the correlation between SPLV and SPMV has dropped to 0.42 - well below their long-term average of 0.72, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

SPLV vs. SPMV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPLV
SPMV

Utilities

26.8%
2.8%

Financial Services

16.6%
17.8%

Real Estate

14.8%
0.2%

Consumer Defensive

10.8%
10.7%

Industrials

10.1%
6.0%

Healthcare

6.8%
15.0%

Consumer Cyclical

5.7%
6.6%

Technology

4.6%
26.9%

Basic Materials

2.0%
2.6%

Energy

0.9%
4.8%

Communication Services

0.9%
6.5%

Utilities

SPLV
26.8%
SPMV
2.8%

Financial Services

SPLV
16.6%
SPMV
17.8%

Real Estate

SPLV
14.8%
SPMV
0.2%

Consumer Defensive

SPLV
10.8%
SPMV
10.7%

Industrials

SPLV
10.1%
SPMV
6.0%

Healthcare

SPLV
6.8%
SPMV
15.0%

Consumer Cyclical

SPLV
5.7%
SPMV
6.6%

Technology

SPLV
4.6%
SPMV
26.9%

Basic Materials

SPLV
2.0%
SPMV
2.6%

Energy

SPLV
0.9%
SPMV
4.8%

Communication Services

SPLV
0.9%
SPMV
6.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPLV vs. SPMV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPLV
SPLV Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
SPLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPLV Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
SPLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPLV Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

SPMV
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPLV vs. SPMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF (SPLV) and Invesco S&P 500 Minimum Variance ETF (SPMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPLVSPMVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.01

SPLV vs. SPMV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPLVSPMVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.68

Drawdowns

SPLV vs. SPMV - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPLVSPMVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.05%

Volatility

SPLV vs. SPMV - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPLVSPMVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.36%

SPLV vs. SPMV - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPLV has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than SPMV's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SPLV vs. SPMV - Dividend Comparison

SPLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.22%, more than SPMV's 1.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPLV
Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF
2.22%2.04%1.88%2.45%2.11%1.51%2.12%2.08%2.18%2.03%2.03%2.28%
SPMV
Invesco S&P 500 Minimum Variance ETF
1.45%1.53%1.53%2.28%1.79%1.28%1.71%3.13%2.11%1.72%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPLV and SPMV have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SPMV is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPMV is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for SPLV.

SPLV has the higher dividend yield at 2.22%, compared with 1.45% for SPMV.

SPLV tracks S&P 500 Low Volatility Index, while SPMV tracks S&P 500 Minimum Volatility Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for SPLV and 0.10% for SPMV.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPLV and SPMV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer