SPLV vs. IYH
SPLV (Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF) and IYH (iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPLV is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Low Volatility Index, while IYH is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Health Care Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPLV returned 8.33%/yr vs 9.63%/yr for IYH. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SPLV charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.43%/yr for IYH.
Performance
SPLV vs. IYH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPLV achieves a 4.85% return, which is significantly higher than IYH's -1.10% return. Over the past 10 years, SPLV has underperformed IYH with an annualized return of 8.33%, while IYH has yielded a comparatively higher 9.63% annualized return.
SPLV
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- 2.76%
- YTD
- 4.85%
- 6M
- 4.17%
- 1Y
- 4.71%
- 3Y*
- 8.01%
- 5Y*
- 6.29%
- 10Y*
- 8.33%
IYH
- 1D
- -0.46%
- 1M
- 5.37%
- YTD
- -1.10%
- 6M
- -1.60%
- 1Y
- 14.30%
- 3Y*
- 6.09%
- 5Y*
- 4.89%
- 10Y*
- 9.63%
SPLV vs. IYH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPLV Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF | 4.85% | 4.10% | 13.93% | 0.53% | -4.88% | 24.13% | -1.39% | 27.87% | -0.19% | 17.32% |
IYH iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF | -1.10% | 13.16% | 2.99% | 2.14% | -4.46% | 23.41% | 15.56% | 20.80% | 5.80% | 22.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPLV and IYH is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2011 | 0.70 |
Over the past year, the correlation between SPLV and IYH has dropped to 0.49 - well below their long-term average of 0.70, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
SPLV vs. IYH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPLV
IYH
Utilities
-
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
-
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
-
Communication Services
-
Utilities
SPLV
IYH
-
Financial Services
SPLV
IYH
-
Real Estate
SPLV
IYH
-
Industrials
SPLV
IYH
-
Consumer Defensive
SPLV
IYH
-
Healthcare
SPLV
IYH
Consumer Cyclical
SPLV
IYH
-
Energy
SPLV
IYH
-
Basic Materials
SPLV
IYH
-
Technology
SPLV
IYH
-
Communication Services
SPLV
IYH
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPLV vs. IYH — Risk / Return Rank
SPLV
IYH
SPLV vs. IYH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF (SPLV) and iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF (IYH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPLV | IYH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.17 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.64 | 1.35 | -0.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.50 | 3.21 | -1.71 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPLV vs. IYH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPLV drawdown since its inception was -36.26%, smaller than the maximum IYH drawdown of -43.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPLV and IYH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPLV | IYH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.26% | -43.12% | +6.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.41% | -10.64% | +3.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.64% | -17.91% | +8.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.26% | -17.91% | +0.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.26% | -28.40% | -7.86% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.66% | -4.38% | +0.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.55% | -8.96% | +5.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.15% | 4.46% | -1.31% |
Volatility
SPLV vs. IYH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF (SPLV) is 4.03%, while iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF (IYH) has a volatility of 4.97%. This indicates that SPLV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IYH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPLV | IYH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.03% | 4.97% | -0.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.20% | 10.61% | -3.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.08% | 15.11% | -5.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.51% | 14.97% | -2.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.38% | 16.75% | -1.37% |
SPLV vs. IYH - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPLV has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than IYH's 0.43% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPLV vs. IYH - Dividend Comparison
SPLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.15%, more than IYH's 1.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IYH iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF | 1.51% | 1.19% | 1.25% | 1.18% | 1.10% | 0.94% | 1.16% | 1.14% | 1.95% | 1.10% | 1.29% | 2.02% |
SPLV Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF | 2.15% | 2.04% | 1.88% | 2.45% | 2.11% | 1.51% | 2.12% | 2.08% | 2.18% | 2.03% | 2.03% | 2.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPLV and IYH have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IYH has higher volatility (4.97%) compared to SPLV (4.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPLV dropped -36.26% vs IYH's -43.12%.
On 10-year performance, IYH leads with 9.63% vs 8.33% for SPLV. On fees, SPLV is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, SPLV has been the lower-risk option at 4.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IYH has performed better with a 9.63% return vs 8.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPLV is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for IYH.
SPLV has the higher dividend yield at 2.15%, compared with 1.51% for IYH.
SPLV is categorized as S&P 500, while IYH is Health & Biotech Equities. SPLV tracks S&P 500 Low Volatility Index, while IYH tracks Dow Jones U.S. Health Care Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for SPLV and 0.43% for IYH.
IYH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.95 vs 0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPLV and IYH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer