PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPLV vs. BWX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPLV vs. BWX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF (SPLV) and SPDR Bloomberg Barclays International Treasury Bond ETF (BWX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPLV achieves a 4.85% return, which is significantly higher than BWX's -1.42% return. Over the past 10 years, SPLV has outperformed BWX with an annualized return of 8.33%, while BWX has yielded a comparatively lower -1.31% annualized return.


SPLV

1D
-0.36%
1M
2.76%
YTD
4.85%
6M
4.17%
1Y
4.71%
3Y*
8.01%
5Y*
6.29%
10Y*
8.33%

BWX

1D
0.27%
1M
1.08%
YTD
-1.42%
6M
-1.46%
1Y
-2.80%
3Y*
1.02%
5Y*
-4.15%
10Y*
-1.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPLV vs. BWX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPLV
Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF
4.85%4.10%13.93%0.53%-4.88%24.13%-1.39%27.87%-0.19%17.32%
BWX
SPDR Bloomberg Barclays International Treasury Bond ETF
-1.42%7.67%-5.93%5.10%-19.72%-8.67%9.50%5.58%-1.85%9.93%

Correlation

The correlation between SPLV and BWX is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2011

0.18

The correlation between SPLV and BWX shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (all time) to 0.29 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPLV vs. BWX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPLV
SPLV Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
SPLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPLV Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
SPLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPLV Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

BWX
BWX Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
BWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
BWX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
BWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
BWX Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPLV vs. BWX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF (SPLV) and SPDR Bloomberg Barclays International Treasury Bond ETF (BWX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPLVBWXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

0.95

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.64

-0.46

+1.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.50

-0.90

+2.40

SPLV vs. BWX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPLV Sharpe Ratio is 0.47, which is higher than the BWX Sharpe Ratio of -0.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPLV and BWX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPLV vs. BWX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPLV drawdown since its inception was -36.26%, which is greater than BWX's maximum drawdown of -34.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPLV and BWX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPLVBWXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.26%

-34.05%

-2.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.41%

-6.16%

-1.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.64%

-10.22%

+0.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.26%

-30.78%

+13.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.26%

-34.05%

-2.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.66%

-23.60%

+19.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.55%

-10.07%

+6.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.15%

3.13%

+0.02%

Volatility

SPLV vs. BWX - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF (SPLV) has a higher volatility of 4.03% compared to SPDR Bloomberg Barclays International Treasury Bond ETF (BWX) at 2.49%. This indicates that SPLV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BWX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPLVBWXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.03%

2.49%

+1.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.20%

5.92%

+1.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.08%

7.66%

+2.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.51%

9.70%

+2.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.38%

8.67%

+6.71%

SPLV vs. BWX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPLV has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than BWX's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPLV vs. BWX - Dividend Comparison

SPLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.15%, less than BWX's 2.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BWX
SPDR Bloomberg Barclays International Treasury Bond ETF
2.36%2.19%1.99%1.63%1.23%0.93%0.95%1.16%1.07%0.46%0.00%0.00%
SPLV
Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF
2.15%2.04%1.88%2.45%2.11%1.51%2.12%2.08%2.18%2.03%2.03%2.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPLV and BWX have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPLV has higher volatility (4.03%) compared to BWX (2.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPLV dropped -36.26% vs BWX's -34.05%.

On 10-year performance, SPLV leads with 8.33% vs -1.31% for BWX. On fees, SPLV is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, BWX has been the lower-risk option at 2.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPLV has performed better with a 8.33% return vs -1.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPLV is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for BWX.

BWX has the higher dividend yield at 2.36%, compared with 2.15% for SPLV.

SPLV is categorized as S&P 500, while BWX is International Government Bonds. SPLV tracks S&P 500 Low Volatility Index, while BWX tracks Bloomberg Global Treasury x US Capped (Inception 8/31/2007). They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for SPLV and 0.35% for BWX.

SPLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.47 vs -0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPLV and BWX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer