BWX vs. CMF
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR Bloomberg Barclays International Treasury Bond ETF (BWX) and iShares California Muni Bond ETF (CMF).
BWX and CMF are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BWX is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Global Treasury x US Capped (Inception 8/31/2007). It was launched on Oct 2, 2007. CMF is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P California AMT-Free Municipal Bond Index. It was launched on Oct 4, 2007. Both BWX and CMF are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: BWX or CMF.
Key characteristics
| BWX | CMF | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -6.62% | -1.40% |
| 1Y Return | -4.63% | 1.90% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -9.16% | -1.36% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | -3.67% | 0.93% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | -2.28% | 2.08% |
| Sharpe Ratio | -0.50 | 0.36 |
| Daily Std Dev | 9.26% | 4.18% |
| Max Drawdown | -34.00% | -16.45% |
| Current Drawdown | -28.49% | -4.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between BWX and CMF is 0.24, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
BWX vs. CMF - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, BWX achieves a -6.62% return, which is significantly lower than CMF's -1.40% return. Over the past 10 years, BWX has underperformed CMF with an annualized return of -2.28%, while CMF has yielded a comparatively higher 2.08% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BWX vs. CMF - Expense Ratio Comparison
BWX has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than CMF's 0.25% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
BWX vs. CMF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg Barclays International Treasury Bond ETF (BWX) and iShares California Muni Bond ETF (CMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
BWX vs. CMF - Dividend Comparison
BWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.82%, less than CMF's 2.46% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BWX SPDR Bloomberg Barclays International Treasury Bond ETF | 1.82% | 1.63% | 1.23% | 1.00% | 0.95% | 1.16% | 1.17% | 0.46% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.77% | 1.86% |
CMF iShares California Muni Bond ETF | 2.46% | 2.29% | 1.74% | 1.58% | 1.80% | 2.03% | 2.17% | 2.09% | 2.21% | 2.55% | 2.80% | 3.12% |
Drawdowns
BWX vs. CMF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BWX drawdown since its inception was -34.00%, which is greater than CMF's maximum drawdown of -16.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BWX and CMF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
BWX vs. CMF - Volatility Comparison
SPDR Bloomberg Barclays International Treasury Bond ETF (BWX) has a higher volatility of 2.28% compared to iShares California Muni Bond ETF (CMF) at 1.07%. This indicates that BWX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.