SPLS vs. MINT
SPLS (PIMCO U.S. Stocks PLUS Active Bond ETF) and MINT (PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPLS is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by PIMCO, while MINT is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by PIMCO. Both are actively managed. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SPLS charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for MINT.
Performance
SPLS vs. MINT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SPLS
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- 4.63%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MINT
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 0.37%
- YTD
- 1.84%
- 6M
- 2.22%
- 1Y
- 4.68%
- 3Y*
- 5.41%
- 5Y*
- 3.48%
- 10Y*
- 2.71%
SPLS vs. MINT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SPLS PIMCO U.S. Stocks PLUS Active Bond ETF | 9.75% |
MINT PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF | 1.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPLS and MINT is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 20, 2026 | 0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPLS vs. MINT — Risk / Return Rank
SPLS
MINT
SPLS vs. MINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO U.S. Stocks PLUS Active Bond ETF (SPLS) and PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF (MINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPLS | MINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 17.12 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 6.00 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 2.88 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.88 | 2.47 | -0.58 |
Drawdowns
SPLS vs. MINT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPLS drawdown since its inception was -9.24%, which is greater than MINT's maximum drawdown of -4.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPLS and MINT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPLS | MINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.24% | -4.62% | -4.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.05% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -0.16% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -2.42% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -4.62% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.31% | 0.00% | -0.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.84% | -0.17% | -1.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.00% | — |
Volatility
SPLS vs. MINT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPLS | MINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.09% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.20% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.94% | 0.27% | +14.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.94% | 0.58% | +14.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.94% | 0.95% | +13.99% |
SPLS vs. MINT - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPLS has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than MINT's 0.36% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPLS vs. MINT - Dividend Comparison
SPLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%, less than MINT's 4.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MINT PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF | 4.28% | 4.63% | 5.22% | 4.91% | 1.90% | 0.44% | 1.15% | 2.65% | 2.32% | 1.61% | 1.35% | 0.88% |
SPLS PIMCO U.S. Stocks PLUS Active Bond ETF | 0.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPLS and MINT have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPLS is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPLS is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for MINT.
MINT has the higher dividend yield at 4.28%, compared with 0.22% for SPLS.
SPLS is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while MINT is Ultrashort Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for SPLS and 0.36% for MINT.
Find the right allocation for SPLS and MINT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer