PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPLS vs. FTBI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPLS vs. FTBI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO U.S. Stocks PLUS Active Bond ETF (SPLS) and First Trust Balanced Income ETF (FTBI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


SPLS

1D
0.35%
1M
4.63%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FTBI

1D
0.20%
1M
2.19%
YTD
6.54%
6M
6.80%
1Y
17.93%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPLS vs. FTBI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SPLS and FTBI is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 20, 2026

0.89

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPLS vs. FTBI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPLS

FTBI
FTBI Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
FTBI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTBI Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTBI Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
FTBI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTBI Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPLS vs. FTBI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO U.S. Stocks PLUS Active Bond ETF (SPLS) and First Trust Balanced Income ETF (FTBI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SPLS vs. FTBI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPLSFTBIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.88

2.65

-0.77

Drawdowns

SPLS vs. FTBI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPLS drawdown since its inception was -9.24%, which is greater than FTBI's maximum drawdown of -5.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPLS and FTBI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPLSFTBIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.24%

-5.34%

-3.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.31%

-0.17%

-0.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.84%

-0.61%

-1.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.17%

Volatility

SPLS vs. FTBI - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPLSFTBIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.94%

7.15%

+7.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.94%

7.13%

+7.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.94%

7.13%

+7.81%

SPLS vs. FTBI - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPLS has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than FTBI's 0.97% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPLS vs. FTBI - Dividend Comparison

SPLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%, less than FTBI's 7.87% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


SPLS and FTBI have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SPLS is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPLS is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for FTBI.

FTBI has the higher dividend yield at 7.87%, compared with 0.22% for SPLS.

They also come from different issuers: PIMCO and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for SPLS and 0.97% for FTBI.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPLS and FTBI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer