SPLG.L vs. QQQM

Last updated Jul 21, 2026

SPLG.L (Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and QQQM (Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPLG.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Low Volatility Index, while QQQM is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SPLG.L returned 6.37%/yr vs 15.25%/yr for QQQM. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SPLG.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for QQQM.

Performance

SPLG.L vs. QQQM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SPLG.L) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

SPLG.L is traded in GBp, while QQQM is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the QQQM values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPLG.L achieves a 7.42% return, which is significantly lower than QQQM's 13.93% return.

SPLG.L

• 1D: -1.07%
• 1M: 3.09%
• 6M: 5.64%
• YTD: 7.42%
• 1Y: 6.93%
• 3Y*: 6.39%
• 5Y*: 6.37%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -0.03%

QQQM

• 1D: 0.25%
• 1M: -7.35%
• 6M: 11.88%
• YTD: 13.93%
• 1Y: 24.54%
• 3Y*: 21.81%
• 5Y*: 15.25%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 16.08%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPLG.L vs. QQQM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
SPLG.L Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc)	7.42%	-2.34%	15.31%	-5.86%	6.95%	-18.01%
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF	13.93%	12.24%	27.88%	47.26%	-24.49%	12.31%

Correlation

The correlation between SPLG.L and QQQM is -0.25, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.25
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.08
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.04
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2021	0.04

The correlation between SPLG.L and QQQM shifts across timeframes, from -0.25 (1 year) to 0.04 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SPLG.L vs. QQQM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SPLG.L	QQQM
Utilities	25.4%	1.1%
Financial Services	21.5%	0.2%
Real Estate	17.9%	0.1%
Industrials	10.9%	2.7%
Consumer Defensive	9.2%	6.3%
Healthcare	4.1%	3.6%
Consumer Cyclical	3.9%	10.7%
Energy	2.6%	0.5%
Basic Materials	2.2%	1.0%
Technology	1.7%	60.9%
Communication Services	0.7%	13.1%

Return for Risk

SPLG.L vs. QQQM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPLG.L

SPLG.L Risk / Return Rank: 24
SPLG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
SPLG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
SPLG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 21
SPLG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
SPLG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 25

QQQM

QQQM Risk / Return Rank: 52
QQQM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
QQQM Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
QQQM Omega Ratio Rank: 49
QQQM Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
QQQM Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPLG.L vs. QQQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SPLG.L) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SPLG.L	QQQM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.64	1.39	-0.75
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.01	1.88	-0.87
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	1.25	-0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.88	2.07	-1.19
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.15	5.90	-3.74

SPLG.L vs. QQQM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPLG.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is lower than the QQQM Sharpe Ratio of 1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPLG.L and QQQM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SPLG.L vs. QQQM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPLG.L drawdown since its inception was -27.94%, roughly equal to the maximum QQQM drawdown of -27.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPLG.L and QQQM.

Drawdown Indicators

	SPLG.L	QQQM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.94%	-27.83%	-0.11%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.84%	-11.88%	+4.04%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.63%	-24.83%	+4.20%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.63%	-27.83%	+7.20%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.61%	-7.35%	+5.74%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.14%	-6.76%	-6.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.21%	4.17%	-0.96%

Volatility

SPLG.L vs. QQQM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SPLG.L) is 3.98%, while Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) has a volatility of 7.03%. This indicates that SPLG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SPLG.L	QQQM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.98%	7.03%	-3.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.58%	14.10%	-5.52%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.81%	17.82%	-7.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.71%	21.38%	-2.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.49%	21.16%	+1.33%

SPLG.L vs. QQQM - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPLG.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQM's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

SPLG.L vs. QQQM - Dividend Comparison

SPLG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF	0.46%	0.50%	0.61%	0.65%	0.83%	0.40%	0.16%
SPLG.L Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc)	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SPLG.L and QQQM in my portfolio?

SPLG.L and QQQM have a correlation of -0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SPLG.L or QQQM?

On fees, QQQM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SPLG.L or QQQM?

QQQM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for SPLG.L.

What is the main difference between SPLG.L and QQQM?

SPLG.L is categorized as S&P 500, while QQQM is Nasdaq-100. SPLG.L tracks S&P 500 Low Volatility Index, while QQQM tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for SPLG.L and 0.15% for QQQM.