SPLG.L vs. JPLG.L

Last updated Jul 21, 2026

SPLG.L (Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and JPLG.L (JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating) are both exchange-traded funds - SPLG.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Low Volatility Index, while JPLG.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SPLG.L returned 6.37%/yr vs 10.12%/yr for JPLG.L. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SPLG.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for JPLG.L.

Performance

SPLG.L vs. JPLG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SPLG.L) and JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating (JPLG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPLG.L achieves a 7.42% return, which is significantly lower than JPLG.L's 12.19% return.

SPLG.L

• 1D: -1.07%
• 1M: 3.09%
• 6M: 5.64%
• YTD: 7.42%
• 1Y: 6.93%
• 3Y*: 6.39%
• 5Y*: 6.37%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -0.03%

JPLG.L

• 1D: -0.33%
• 1M: -0.08%
• 6M: 9.37%
• YTD: 12.19%
• 1Y: 21.12%
• 3Y*: 13.32%
• 5Y*: 10.12%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 9.59%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPLG.L vs. JPLG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
SPLG.L Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc)	7.42%	-2.34%	15.31%	-5.86%	6.95%	-18.01%
JPLG.L JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating	12.19%	10.11%	12.09%	7.05%	0.72%	8.71%

Correlation

The correlation between SPLG.L and JPLG.L is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.55
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.65
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.68
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2021	0.68

The correlation between SPLG.L and JPLG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (1 year) to 0.68 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SPLG.L vs. JPLG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SPLG.L	JPLG.L
Utilities	25.4%	8.8%
Financial Services	21.5%	11.0%
Real Estate	17.9%	7.2%
Industrials	10.9%	10.4%
Consumer Defensive	9.2%	8.3%
Healthcare	4.1%	12.0%
Consumer Cyclical	3.9%	7.9%
Energy	2.6%	7.7%
Basic Materials	2.2%	8.4%
Technology	1.7%	12.6%
Communication Services	0.7%	5.6%

Return for Risk

SPLG.L vs. JPLG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPLG.L

SPLG.L Risk / Return Rank: 24
SPLG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
SPLG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
SPLG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 21
SPLG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
SPLG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 25

JPLG.L

JPLG.L Risk / Return Rank: 91
JPLG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
JPLG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
JPLG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 92
JPLG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
JPLG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPLG.L vs. JPLG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SPLG.L) and JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating (JPLG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SPLG.L	JPLG.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.64	2.66	-2.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.01	3.62	-2.61
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	1.47	-0.36
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.88	3.76	-2.88
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.15	13.80	-11.65

SPLG.L vs. JPLG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPLG.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is lower than the JPLG.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPLG.L and JPLG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SPLG.L vs. JPLG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPLG.L drawdown since its inception was -27.94%, roughly equal to the maximum JPLG.L drawdown of -27.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPLG.L and JPLG.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	SPLG.L	JPLG.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.94%	-27.53%	-0.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.84%	-5.59%	-2.25%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.63%	-13.65%	-6.98%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.63%	-13.65%	-6.98%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.61%	-1.46%	-0.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.14%	-3.25%	-9.89%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.21%	1.53%	+1.68%

Volatility

SPLG.L vs. JPLG.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SPLG.L) has a higher volatility of 3.98% compared to JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating (JPLG.L) at 2.38%. This indicates that SPLG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JPLG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SPLG.L	JPLG.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.98%	2.38%	+1.60%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.58%	6.04%	+2.54%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.81%	7.93%	+2.88%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.71%	10.88%	+7.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.49%	13.66%	+8.83%

SPLG.L vs. JPLG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPLG.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than JPLG.L's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

SPLG.L vs. JPLG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither SPLG.L nor JPLG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SPLG.L and JPLG.L in my portfolio?

SPLG.L and JPLG.L have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SPLG.L or JPLG.L?

On fees, JPLG.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SPLG.L or JPLG.L?

JPLG.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for SPLG.L.

What is the main difference between SPLG.L and JPLG.L?

SPLG.L is categorized as S&P 500, while JPLG.L is Global Equities. SPLG.L tracks S&P 500 Low Volatility Index, while JPLG.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for SPLG.L and 0.20% for JPLG.L.