SPLG.L vs. 3USL.L
SPLG.L (Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and 3USL.L (WisdomTree S&P 500 3x Daily Leveraged GB) are both exchange-traded funds - SPLG.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Low Volatility Index, while 3USL.L is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Net Total Returns Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SPLG.L returned 6.37%/yr vs 19.47%/yr for 3USL.L. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SPLG.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for 3USL.L.
Performance
SPLG.L vs. 3USL.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SPLG.L is traded in GBp, while 3USL.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the 3USL.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPLG.L achieves a 7.42% return, which is significantly lower than 3USL.L's 18.98% return.
SPLG.L
- 1D
- -1.07%
- 1M
- 3.09%
- 6M
- 5.64%
- YTD
- 7.42%
- 1Y
- 6.93%
- 3Y*
- 6.39%
- 5Y*
- 6.37%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -0.03%
3USL.L
- 1D
- 0.47%
- 1M
- -3.04%
- 6M
- 20.45%
- YTD
- 18.98%
- 1Y
- 46.46%
- 3Y*
- 38.08%
- 5Y*
- 19.47%
- 10Y*
- 26.57%
- ALL TIME*
- 31.67%
SPLG.L vs. 3USL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPLG.L Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 7.42% | -2.34% | 15.31% | -5.86% | 6.95% | -18.01% |
3USL.L WisdomTree S&P 500 3x Daily Leveraged GB | 18.98% | 19.79% | 66.85% | 61.98% | -52.28% | 29.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPLG.L and 3USL.L is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2021 | 0.26 |
The correlation between SPLG.L and 3USL.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (1 year) to 0.26 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SPLG.L vs. 3USL.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPLG.L
3USL.L
Utilities
Financial Services
Real Estate
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Basic Materials
Technology
Communication Services
Utilities
SPLG.L
3USL.L
Financial Services
SPLG.L
3USL.L
Real Estate
SPLG.L
3USL.L
Industrials
SPLG.L
3USL.L
Consumer Defensive
SPLG.L
3USL.L
Healthcare
SPLG.L
3USL.L
Consumer Cyclical
SPLG.L
3USL.L
Energy
SPLG.L
3USL.L
Basic Materials
SPLG.L
3USL.L
Technology
SPLG.L
3USL.L
Communication Services
SPLG.L
3USL.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPLG.L vs. 3USL.L — Risk / Return Rank
SPLG.L
3USL.L
SPLG.L vs. 3USL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SPLG.L) and WisdomTree S&P 500 3x Daily Leveraged GB (3USL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPLG.L | 3USL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.24 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.88 | 1.85 | -0.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.15 | 6.49 | -4.34 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPLG.L vs. 3USL.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPLG.L drawdown since its inception was -27.94%, smaller than the maximum 3USL.L drawdown of -73.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPLG.L and 3USL.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPLG.L | 3USL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.94% | -73.93% | +45.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.84% | -25.03% | +17.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.63% | -49.78% | +29.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.63% | -55.89% | +35.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -73.93% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.61% | -6.69% | +5.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.14% | -13.85% | +0.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.21% | 7.14% | -3.93% |
Volatility
SPLG.L vs. 3USL.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SPLG.L) is 3.98%, while WisdomTree S&P 500 3x Daily Leveraged GB (3USL.L) has a volatility of 9.37%. This indicates that SPLG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 3USL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPLG.L | 3USL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.98% | 9.37% | -5.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.58% | 26.74% | -18.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.81% | 35.03% | -24.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.71% | 45.56% | -26.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.49% | 46.96% | -24.47% |
SPLG.L vs. 3USL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPLG.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than 3USL.L's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPLG.L vs. 3USL.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither SPLG.L nor 3USL.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SPLG.L and 3USL.L have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPLG.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPLG.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for 3USL.L.
SPLG.L is categorized as S&P 500, while 3USL.L is Leveraged Equities. SPLG.L tracks S&P 500 Low Volatility Index, while 3USL.L tracks S&P 500 Net Total Returns Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for SPLG.L and 0.75% for 3USL.L.
Find the right allocation for SPLG.L and 3USL.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer