PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPLB vs. UUP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPLB vs. UUP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Portfolio Long Term Corporate Bond ETF (SPLB) and Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund (UUP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPLB achieves a -1.08% return, which is significantly lower than UUP's 5.44% return. Over the past 10 years, SPLB has underperformed UUP with an annualized return of 1.61%, while UUP has yielded a comparatively higher 3.17% annualized return.


SPLB

1D
-0.69%
1M
-2.46%
6M
-1.60%
YTD
-1.08%
1Y
3.73%
3Y*
3.34%
5Y*
-3.03%
10Y*
1.61%

UUP

1D
0.39%
1M
1.97%
6M
4.47%
YTD
5.44%
1Y
8.28%
3Y*
5.86%
5Y*
5.89%
10Y*
3.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPLB vs. UUP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPLB
SPDR Portfolio Long Term Corporate Bond ETF
-1.08%7.05%-1.74%11.20%-25.68%-1.99%13.47%23.49%-7.35%12.26%
UUP
Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund
5.44%-4.99%13.50%3.63%9.46%5.73%-6.66%4.09%7.05%-9.10%

Correlation

The correlation between SPLB and UUP is -0.41, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.37

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.34

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 11, 2009

-0.15

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between SPLB and UUP has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.15 to -0.41, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPLB vs. UUP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPLB
SPLB Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
SPLB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPLB Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPLB Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
SPLB Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPLB Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

UUP
UUP Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
UUP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UUP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
UUP Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
UUP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
UUP Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPLB vs. UUP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio Long Term Corporate Bond ETF (SPLB) and Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund (UUP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPLBUUPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.25

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.69

2.28

-1.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.66

6.26

-4.60

SPLB vs. UUP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPLB Sharpe Ratio is 0.48, which is lower than the UUP Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPLB and UUP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPLB vs. UUP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPLB drawdown since its inception was -34.46%, which is greater than UUP's maximum drawdown of -22.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPLB and UUP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPLBUUPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.46%

-22.19%

-12.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.42%

-3.65%

-1.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.91%

-10.05%

-2.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.46%

-10.37%

-24.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.46%

-14.24%

-20.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.23%

-1.26%

-14.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.04%

-8.88%

+0.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.25%

1.33%

+0.92%

Volatility

SPLB vs. UUP - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Portfolio Long Term Corporate Bond ETF (SPLB) has a higher volatility of 2.34% compared to Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund (UUP) at 1.45%. This indicates that SPLB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UUP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPLBUUPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.34%

1.45%

+0.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.10%

4.34%

+1.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.87%

6.03%

+1.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.70%

7.22%

+5.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.93%

6.90%

+6.03%

SPLB vs. UUP - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPLB has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than UUP's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPLB vs. UUP - Dividend Comparison

SPLB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.52%, more than UUP's 3.25% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPLB
SPDR Portfolio Long Term Corporate Bond ETF
5.52%5.25%5.20%4.60%4.53%3.00%3.01%3.79%4.50%4.06%4.34%4.70%
UUP
Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund
3.25%3.43%4.48%6.44%0.89%0.00%0.00%2.03%1.08%0.10%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPLB and UUP have a correlation of -0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPLB has higher volatility (2.34%) compared to UUP (1.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPLB dropped -34.46% vs UUP's -22.19%.

On 10-year performance, UUP leads with 3.17% vs 1.61% for SPLB. On fees, SPLB is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, UUP has been the lower-risk option at 1.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, UUP has performed better with a 3.17% return vs 1.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPLB is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for UUP.

SPLB has the higher dividend yield at 5.52%, compared with 3.25% for UUP.

SPLB is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while UUP is Currency. SPLB tracks Bloomberg Barclays Long U.S. Corporate Index, while UUP tracks Deutsche Bank Long US Dollar Index (USDX) Futures Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for SPLB and 0.75% for UUP.

UUP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.38 vs 0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPLB and UUP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer