PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
SPIP vs. XLK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

SPIP vs. XLK

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SPIP (SPDR Portfolio TIPS ETF) and XLK (State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPIP is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Barclays US Government Inflation-linked Bond Index, while XLK is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPIP returned 2.61%/yr vs 25.84%/yr for XLK. At a correlation of -0.11, they often move in opposite directions. SPIP charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLK.

Performance

SPIP vs. XLK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Portfolio TIPS ETF (SPIP) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPIP achieves a 1.49% return, which is significantly lower than XLK's 36.47% return. Over the past 10 years, SPIP has underperformed XLK with an annualized return of 2.61%, while XLK has yielded a comparatively higher 25.84% annualized return.

SPIP

1D
-0.16%
1M
0.02%
YTD
1.49%
6M
1.02%
1Y
4.97%
3Y*
3.85%
5Y*
0.87%
10Y*
2.61%

XLK

1D
-1.00%
1M
21.09%
YTD
36.47%
6M
35.71%
1Y
66.93%
3Y*
33.90%
5Y*
23.83%
10Y*
25.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPIP vs. XLK - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPIP
SPDR Portfolio TIPS ETF		1.49%6.78%2.35%2.98%-12.84%5.80%11.41%9.14%-1.53%3.16%
XLK
State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF		36.47%24.61%21.63%56.02%-27.73%34.74%43.62%49.86%-1.68%34.26%

Correlation

The correlation between SPIP and XLK is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 31, 2007

-0.11

The correlation between SPIP and XLK shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (all time) to 0.12 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

SPDR Portfolio TIPS ETF

State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF

Often compared with SPIP:
SPIP vs. TIPSPIP vs. VTIPSPIP vs. SCHPSPIP vs. TIPXSPIP vs. FIPDXSPIP vs. TDTTSPIP vs. BKLN
Often compared with XLK:
XLK vs. QQQXLK vs. VGTXLK vs. SMHXLK vs. SPYXLK vs. FTECXLK vs. IYWXLK vs. XLE

Return for Risk

SPIP vs. XLK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
SPIP
SPIP Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
SPIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPIP Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
SPIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPIP Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
XLK
XLK Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
XLK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLK Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLK Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
XLK Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLK Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPIP vs. XLK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio TIPS ETF (SPIP) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

SPIPXLKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.40
3.24

-1.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.04
3.92

-1.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.52

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.44

4.22

-1.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.15

14.16

-7.01

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SPIP vs. XLK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPIP Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is lower than the XLK Sharpe Ratio of 3.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPIP and XLK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

SPIPXLKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.40

3.24

-1.84

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

0.96

-0.83

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

1.06

-0.62

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.42

+0.11

Drawdowns

SPIP vs. XLK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPIP drawdown since its inception was -15.39%, smaller than the maximum XLK drawdown of -82.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPIP and XLK.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

SPIPXLKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.39%

-82.05%

+66.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.04%

-15.92%

+13.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.76%

-25.66%

+20.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.39%

-33.56%

+18.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.39%

-33.56%

+18.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.02%

-1.00%

-0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.10%

-34.96%

+30.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.70%

4.74%

-4.04%

Volatility

SPIP vs. XLK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Portfolio TIPS ETF (SPIP) is 0.95%, while State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) has a volatility of 6.98%. This indicates that SPIP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

SPIPXLKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.95%

6.98%

-6.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.54%

16.68%

-14.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.57%

20.82%

-17.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.57%

24.90%

-18.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.01%

24.49%

-18.48%

SPIP vs. XLK - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPIP has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than XLK's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

SPIP vs. XLK - Dividend Comparison

SPIP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.75%, more than XLK's 0.39% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPIP
SPDR Portfolio TIPS ETF		4.75%4.09%3.36%3.70%7.05%4.53%1.97%2.91%2.80%3.02%1.88%0.14%
XLK
State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF		0.39%0.54%0.66%0.76%1.04%0.65%0.92%1.16%1.60%1.37%1.74%1.79%

Frequently Asked Questions

SPIP and XLK have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XLK has higher volatility (6.98%) compared to SPIP (0.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPIP dropped -15.39% vs XLK's -82.05%.

On 10-year performance, XLK leads with 25.84% vs 2.61% for SPIP. On fees, XLK is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, SPIP has been the lower-risk option at 0.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XLK has performed better with a 25.84% return vs 2.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLK is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for SPIP.

SPIP has the higher dividend yield at 4.75%, compared with 0.39% for XLK.

SPIP is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while XLK is Technology Equities. SPIP tracks Bloomberg Barclays US Government Inflation-linked Bond Index, while XLK tracks S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for SPIP and 0.08% for XLK.

XLK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.24 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPIP and XLK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer