SPIAX vs. FGTAX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

SPIAX (Invesco S&P 500 Index A) and FGTAX (Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class A) are both mutual funds - SPIAX is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500, while FGTAX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, SPIAX returned 14.97%/yr vs 16.38%/yr for FGTAX. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. SPIAX charges 0.54%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for FGTAX.

Performance

SPIAX vs. FGTAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Index A (SPIAX) and Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class A (FGTAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SPIAX having a 9.93% return and FGTAX slightly higher at 9.95%. Over the past 10 years, SPIAX has underperformed FGTAX with an annualized return of 14.97%, while FGTAX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.38% annualized return.

SPIAX

• 1D: 1.08%
• 1M: 0.42%
• YTD: 9.93%
• 6M: 9.41%
• 1Y: 26.58%
• 3Y*: 20.35%
• 5Y*: 13.50%
• 10Y*: 14.97%

FGTAX

• 1D: 0.99%
• 1M: 0.63%
• YTD: 9.95%
• 6M: 10.16%
• 1Y: 29.65%
• 3Y*: 24.32%
• 5Y*: 16.72%
• 10Y*: 16.38%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPIAX vs. FGTAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SPIAX Invesco S&P 500 Index A	9.93%	17.23%	24.34%	25.63%	-18.56%	27.99%	17.84%	30.78%	-4.97%	21.13%
FGTAX Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class A	9.95%	26.58%	25.62%	26.18%	-9.26%	25.98%	12.59%	30.74%	-7.68%	17.54%

Correlation

The correlation between SPIAX and FGTAX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.95
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.94
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 7, 2008	0.96

The correlation between SPIAX and FGTAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

SPIAX vs. FGTAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPIAX

SPIAX Risk / Return Rank: 63
SPIAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
SPIAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
SPIAX Omega Ratio Rank: 57
SPIAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
SPIAX Martin Ratio Rank: 76

FGTAX

FGTAX Risk / Return Rank: 76
FGTAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
FGTAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
FGTAX Omega Ratio Rank: 70
FGTAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
FGTAX Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPIAX vs. FGTAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Index A (SPIAX) and Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class A (FGTAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SPIAX	FGTAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.12	2.36	-0.24
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.87	3.24	-0.37
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.43	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.96	3.27	-0.31
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.30	14.49	-1.19

SPIAX vs. FGTAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPIAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is comparable to the FGTAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPIAX and FGTAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SPIAX vs. FGTAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPIAX drawdown since its inception was -55.47%, roughly equal to the maximum FGTAX drawdown of -53.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPIAX and FGTAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SPIAX	FGTAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.47%	-53.07%	-2.40%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.97%	-9.04%	+0.07%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.84%	-18.52%	-0.32%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.81%	-23.48%	-1.33%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.84%	-35.21%	+1.37%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.39%	-0.68%	-0.71%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.77%	-6.76%	-4.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.99%	2.03%	-0.04%

Volatility

SPIAX vs. FGTAX - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 Index A (SPIAX) has a higher volatility of 4.76% compared to Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class A (FGTAX) at 4.36%. This indicates that SPIAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FGTAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SPIAX	FGTAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.76%	4.36%	+0.40%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.92%	9.74%	+0.18%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.51%	12.50%	+0.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.00%	16.75%	+0.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.13%	18.14%	-0.01%

SPIAX vs. FGTAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPIAX has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is lower than FGTAX's 0.90% expense ratio.

Dividends

SPIAX vs. FGTAX - Dividend Comparison

SPIAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%, less than FGTAX's 3.38% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FGTAX Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class A	3.38%	3.72%	2.48%	1.86%	4.17%	4.61%	7.84%	12.91%	21.65%	16.21%	1.75%	3.75%
SPIAX Invesco S&P 500 Index A	0.92%	1.01%	1.08%	1.04%	1.07%	1.90%	1.26%	1.93%	2.59%	1.28%	1.28%	1.53%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SPIAX and FGTAX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, SPIAX and FGTAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, SPIAX or FGTAX?

SPIAX has higher volatility (4.76%) compared to FGTAX (4.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPIAX dropped -55.47% vs FGTAX's -53.07%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FGTAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.