PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPHY vs. SCMB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPHY vs. SCMB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Portfolio High Yield Bond ETF (SPHY) and Schwab Municipal Bond ETF (SCMB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPHY achieves a 1.85% return, which is significantly higher than SCMB's 1.07% return.


SPHY

1D
0.04%
1M
0.67%
YTD
1.85%
6M
2.41%
1Y
7.35%
3Y*
8.90%
5Y*
4.36%
10Y*
5.21%

SCMB

1D
0.00%
1M
0.60%
YTD
1.07%
6M
1.59%
1Y
6.26%
3Y*
3.26%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPHY vs. SCMB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
SPHY
SPDR Portfolio High Yield Bond ETF
1.85%8.59%8.54%12.81%4.43%
SCMB
Schwab Municipal Bond ETF
1.07%3.78%0.91%5.86%2.88%

Correlation

The correlation between SPHY and SCMB is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2022

0.43

The correlation between SPHY and SCMB shifts across timeframes, from 0.38 (1 year) to 0.48 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPHY vs. SCMB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPHY
SPHY Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
SPHY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPHY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPHY Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
SPHY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPHY Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

SCMB
SCMB Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
SCMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCMB Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
SCMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCMB Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPHY vs. SCMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio High Yield Bond ETF (SPHY) and Schwab Municipal Bond ETF (SCMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPHYSCMBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.44

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.94

2.08

+0.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.29

6.87

+6.41

SPHY vs. SCMB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPHY Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is comparable to the SCMB Sharpe Ratio of 2.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPHY and SCMB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPHY vs. SCMB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPHY drawdown since its inception was -21.97%, which is greater than SCMB's maximum drawdown of -6.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPHY and SCMB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPHYSCMBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.97%

-6.13%

-15.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.41%

-2.92%

+0.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.85%

-5.57%

+0.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.87%

+0.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.29%

-1.32%

-0.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.53%

0.88%

-0.35%

Volatility

SPHY vs. SCMB - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Portfolio High Yield Bond ETF (SPHY) has a higher volatility of 1.16% compared to Schwab Municipal Bond ETF (SCMB) at 0.96%. This indicates that SPHY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPHYSCMBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.16%

0.96%

+0.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.95%

2.16%

+0.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.72%

2.89%

+0.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.18%

4.15%

+3.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.87%

4.15%

+3.72%

SPHY vs. SCMB - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPHY has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is higher than SCMB's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SPHY vs. SCMB - Dividend Comparison

SPHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.24%, more than SCMB's 3.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCMB
Schwab Municipal Bond ETF
3.54%3.36%3.34%3.10%0.59%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPHY
SPDR Portfolio High Yield Bond ETF
7.24%7.38%7.80%7.30%6.47%5.13%5.63%5.73%4.09%4.41%4.27%4.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPHY and SCMB have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPHY has higher volatility (1.16%) compared to SCMB (0.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPHY dropped -21.97% vs SCMB's -6.13%.

On 3-year performance, SPHY leads with 8.90% vs 3.26% for SCMB. On fees, SCMB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SCMB has been the lower-risk option at 0.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, SPHY has performed better with a 8.90% return vs 3.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCMB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.05% for SPHY.

SPHY has the higher dividend yield at 7.24%, compared with 3.54% for SCMB.

SPHY is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while SCMB is Municipal Bonds. SPHY tracks ICE BofA US High Yield Index, while SCMB tracks ICE AMT-Free Core U.S. National Municipal Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for SPHY and 0.03% for SCMB.

SCMB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPHY and SCMB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer