SPHR vs. VRT
SPHR (Sphere Entertainment Co.) and VRT (Vertiv Holdings Co.) are both stocks. SPHR operates in Entertainment (Communication Services), while VRT operates in Electrical Equipment & Parts (Industrials). Over the past 5 years, SPHR returned 12.63%/yr vs 67.87%/yr for VRT. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SPHR vs. VRT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPHR achieves a 65.38% return, which is significantly lower than VRT's 121.05% return.
SPHR
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 21.54%
- YTD
- 65.38%
- 6M
- 65.01%
- 1Y
- 307.99%
- 3Y*
- 78.77%
- 5Y*
- 12.63%
- 10Y*
- —
VRT
- 1D
- 7.48%
- 1M
- 9.34%
- YTD
- 121.05%
- 6M
- 115.41%
- 1Y
- 202.31%
- 3Y*
- 147.70%
- 5Y*
- 67.87%
- 10Y*
- —
SPHR vs. VRT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPHR Sphere Entertainment Co. | 65.38% | 135.81% | 18.73% | -24.48% | -36.07% | -33.04% | 5.04% |
VRT Vertiv Holdings Co. | 121.05% | 42.80% | 136.82% | 251.81% | -45.25% | 33.80% | 119.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPHR and VRT is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 9, 2020 | 0.31 |
The correlation between SPHR and VRT shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (1 year) to 0.34 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
SPHR:
$5.64B
VRT:
$140.37B
SPHR:
$2.78
VRT:
$3.99
SPHR:
56.59
VRT:
89.81
SPHR:
0.05
VRT:
0.39
SPHR:
4.86
VRT:
12.91
SPHR:
2.51
VRT:
33.07
SPHR:
$1.33B
VRT:
$10.84B
SPHR:
$507.82M
VRT:
$3.92B
SPHR:
$531.96M
VRT:
$2.35B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPHR vs. VRT — Risk / Return Rank
SPHR
VRT
SPHR vs. VRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sphere Entertainment Co. (SPHR) and Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPHR | VRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.68 | 1.46 | +0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 17.57 | 8.04 | +9.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 56.89 | 21.32 | +35.58 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPHR vs. VRT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPHR drawdown since its inception was -81.69%, which is greater than VRT's maximum drawdown of -71.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPHR and VRT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPHR | VRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.69% | -71.24% | -10.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.66% | -25.32% | +7.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -52.29% | -61.28% | +8.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -75.30% | -71.24% | -4.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.06% | -4.83% | +4.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -46.25% | -16.22% | -30.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.44% | 9.53% | -4.09% |
Volatility
SPHR vs. VRT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Sphere Entertainment Co. (SPHR) is 11.49%, while Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT) has a volatility of 17.12%. This indicates that SPHR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPHR | VRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.49% | 17.12% | -5.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.49% | 45.12% | -7.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.06% | 59.08% | -8.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 57.64% | 62.12% | -4.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 56.21% | 54.70% | +1.51% |
Dividends
SPHR vs. VRT - Dividend Comparison
SPHR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPHR Sphere Entertainment Co. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VRT Vertiv Holdings Co. | 0.06% | 0.11% | 0.10% | 0.05% | 0.07% | 0.04% | 0.05% |
Financials
SPHR vs. VRT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sphere Entertainment Co. and Vertiv Holdings Co.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SPHR vs. VRT - Profitability Comparison
SPHR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sphere Entertainment Co. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 386.41M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
VRT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vertiv Holdings Co. reported a gross profit of 999.70M and revenue of 2.65B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.7%.
SPHR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sphere Entertainment Co. reported an operating income of 7.20M and revenue of 386.41M, resulting in an operating margin of 1.9%.
VRT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vertiv Holdings Co. reported an operating income of 440.10M and revenue of 2.65B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.6%.
SPHR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sphere Entertainment Co. reported a net income of -1.59M and revenue of 386.41M, resulting in a net margin of -0.4%.
VRT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vertiv Holdings Co. reported a net income of 390.10M and revenue of 2.65B, resulting in a net margin of 14.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SPHR and VRT have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VRT has higher volatility (17.12%) compared to SPHR (11.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPHR dropped -81.69% vs VRT's -71.24%.
SPHR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.09 vs 3.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPHR and VRT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer