SPHQ vs. PSET
SPHQ (Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF) and PSET (Principal Quality ETF) are both Quality Factor funds - SPHQ tracks the S&P 500 Quality Index while PSET tracks the NASDAQ US Price Setters. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPHQ returned 14.58%/yr vs 12.87%/yr for PSET. Their 0.69 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. Both charge a 0.15% expense ratio.
Performance
SPHQ vs. PSET - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPHQ achieves a 14.14% return, which is significantly higher than PSET's 4.64% return. Over the past 10 years, SPHQ has outperformed PSET with an annualized return of 14.58%, while PSET has yielded a comparatively lower 12.87% annualized return.
SPHQ
- 1D
- 0.56%
- 1M
- -3.11%
- 6M
- 8.93%
- YTD
- 14.14%
- 1Y
- 21.69%
- 3Y*
- 19.92%
- 5Y*
- 12.81%
- 10Y*
- 14.58%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.03%
PSET
- 1D
- 1.49%
- 1M
- 4.13%
- 6M
- 4.98%
- YTD
- 4.64%
- 1Y
- 8.97%
- 3Y*
- 12.66%
- 5Y*
- 8.37%
- 10Y*
- 12.87%
- ALL TIME*
- 13.07%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $120.42K | $93.26K | $181.37K | |
| $121.34M | $134.31M | $144.70M |
SPHQ vs. PSET - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPHQ Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF | 14.14% | 13.25% | 25.44% | 24.83% | -15.76% | 28.03% | 17.36% | 33.64% | -7.10% | 19.10% |
PSET Principal Quality ETF | 4.64% | 7.27% | 17.65% | 24.07% | -16.52% | 29.59% | 16.20% | 34.85% | -2.29% | 24.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPHQ and PSET is 0.72, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.72 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.86 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 22, 2016 | 0.69 |
The correlation between SPHQ and PSET shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (all time) to 0.86 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SPHQ vs. PSET - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPHQ
PSET
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
-
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Energy
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
SPHQ
PSET
Industrials
SPHQ
PSET
Financial Services
SPHQ
PSET
Consumer Defensive
SPHQ
PSET
Communication Services
SPHQ
PSET
Consumer Cyclical
SPHQ
PSET
Utilities
SPHQ
PSET
-
Healthcare
SPHQ
PSET
Basic Materials
SPHQ
PSET
Energy
SPHQ
PSET
Real Estate
SPHQ
-
PSET
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPHQ vs. PSET — Risk / Return Rank
SPHQ
PSET
SPHQ vs. PSET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ) and Principal Quality ETF (PSET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPHQ | PSET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.12 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.45 | 0.70 | +1.75 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.64 | 2.28 | +6.37 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPHQ vs. PSET - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPHQ drawdown since its inception was -57.83%, which is greater than PSET's maximum drawdown of -34.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPHQ and PSET.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPHQ | PSET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.83% | -34.74% | -23.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.90% | -12.94% | +4.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.57% | -21.96% | +5.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.04% | -25.61% | +0.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.60% | -34.74% | +3.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.50% | 0.00% | -5.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.64% | -4.55% | -6.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.52% | 3.95% | -1.43% |
Volatility
SPHQ vs. PSET - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ) has a higher volatility of 4.77% compared to Principal Quality ETF (PSET) at 3.46%. This indicates that SPHQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PSET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPHQ | PSET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.77% | 3.46% | +1.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.37% | 10.21% | +2.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.51% | 13.05% | +1.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.74% | 17.61% | -0.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.98% | 18.12% | -0.14% |
SPHQ vs. PSET - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SPHQ and PSET have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SPHQ vs. PSET - Dividend Comparison
SPHQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.10%, more than PSET's 0.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSET Principal Quality ETF | 0.68% | 0.59% | 0.69% | 0.85% | 1.47% | 0.89% | 1.09% | 1.52% | 1.33% | 1.02% | 1.26% | 0.00% |
SPHQ Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF | 1.10% | 1.09% | 1.15% | 1.42% | 1.85% | 1.19% | 1.55% | 1.51% | 1.85% | 1.57% | 1.67% | 2.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPHQ and PSET have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPHQ has higher volatility (4.77%) compared to PSET (3.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPHQ dropped -57.83% vs PSET's -34.74%.
On 10-year performance, SPHQ leads with 14.58% vs 12.87% for PSET. Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. On volatility, PSET has been the lower-risk option at 3.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPHQ has performed better with a 14.58% return vs 12.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPHQ and PSET have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.
SPHQ has the higher dividend yield at 1.10%, compared with 0.68% for PSET.
SPHQ tracks S&P 500 Quality Index, while PSET tracks NASDAQ US Price Setters. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Principal.
SPHQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs 0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPHQ and PSET
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer