SPHQ vs. PBFR
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ) and PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF (PBFR).
SPHQ and PBFR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SPHQ is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Quality Index. It was launched on Dec 6, 2005. PBFR is an actively managed fund by PGIM. It was launched on Jun 11, 2024.
Performance
SPHQ vs. PBFR - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SPHQ vs. PBFR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
SPHQ Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF | 0.57% | 13.25% | 5.58% |
PBFR PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF | -0.75% | 10.44% | 5.53% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPHQ achieves a 0.57% return, which is significantly higher than PBFR's -0.75% return.
SPHQ
- 1D
- 2.36%
- 1M
- -6.75%
- YTD
- 0.57%
- 6M
- 3.29%
- 1Y
- 14.73%
- 3Y*
- 18.19%
- 5Y*
- 12.50%
- 10Y*
- 13.53%
PBFR
- 1D
- 1.19%
- 1M
- -1.46%
- YTD
- -0.75%
- 6M
- 1.42%
- 1Y
- 10.89%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SPHQ vs. PBFR - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPHQ has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than PBFR's 0.50% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SPHQ vs. PBFR — Risk / Return Rank
SPHQ
PBFR
SPHQ vs. PBFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ) and PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF (PBFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPHQ | PBFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.86 | 1.34 | -0.47 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.34 | 1.99 | -0.65 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.35 | -0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.46 | 1.84 | -0.38 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.45 | 10.86 | -4.41 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPHQ | PBFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 | 1.34 | -0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 1.20 | -0.70 |
Correlation
The correlation between SPHQ and PBFR is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SPHQ vs. PBFR - Dividend Comparison
SPHQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%, more than PBFR's 0.01% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPHQ Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF | 1.19% | 1.09% | 1.15% | 1.42% | 1.85% | 1.19% | 1.55% | 1.51% | 1.85% | 1.57% | 1.67% | 2.29% |
PBFR PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
SPHQ vs. PBFR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPHQ drawdown since its inception was -57.83%, which is greater than PBFR's maximum drawdown of -8.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPHQ and PBFR.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPHQ | PBFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.83% | -8.50% | -49.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.84% | -6.15% | -4.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.04% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.60% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.75% | -1.56% | -5.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.78% | -0.68% | -10.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.45% | 1.04% | +1.41% |
Volatility
SPHQ vs. PBFR - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ) has a higher volatility of 5.40% compared to PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF (PBFR) at 2.42%. This indicates that SPHQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PBFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SPHQ | PBFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.40% | 2.42% | +2.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.64% | 3.46% | +6.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.13% | 8.18% | +8.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.40% | 7.13% | +9.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.81% | 7.13% | +10.68% |