SPHQ vs. CPSU

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

SPHQ (Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF) and CPSU (Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - June) are both exchange-traded funds - SPHQ is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Quality Index, while CPSU is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Calamos. SPHQ is passively managed, while CPSU is actively managed. Over the past year, SPHQ returned 23.61% vs 6.60% for CPSU. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SPHQ charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for CPSU.

Performance

SPHQ vs. CPSU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ) and Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - June (CPSU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPHQ achieves a 15.16% return, which is significantly higher than CPSU's 2.35% return.

SPHQ

• 1D: 1.26%
• 1M: 6.56%
• YTD: 15.16%
• 6M: 16.32%
• 1Y: 23.61%
• 3Y*: 22.29%
• 5Y*: 14.73%
• 10Y*: 14.98%

CPSU

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: 0.49%
• YTD: 2.35%
• 6M: 2.95%
• 1Y: 6.60%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPHQ vs. CPSU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SPHQ Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF	15.16%	7.34%
CPSU Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - June	2.35%	4.15%

Correlation

The correlation between SPHQ and CPSU is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2025	0.64

Return for Risk

SPHQ vs. CPSU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPHQ

SPHQ Risk / Return Rank: 56
SPHQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
SPHQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
SPHQ Omega Ratio Rank: 51
SPHQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
SPHQ Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPHQ vs. CPSU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ) and Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - June (CPSU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SPHQ	CPSU	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.88	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.73	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.70	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	11.50	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SPHQ	CPSU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.88	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.90	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.84	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.53	3.85	-3.32

Drawdowns

SPHQ vs. CPSU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPHQ drawdown since its inception was -57.83%, which is greater than CPSU's maximum drawdown of -1.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPHQ and CPSU.

Drawdown Indicators

	SPHQ	CPSU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-57.83%	-1.03%	-56.80%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.90%	-1.03%	-7.87%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.57%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.04%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-31.60%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.10%	+0.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.70%	-0.07%	-10.63%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.08%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SPHQ	CPSU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.55%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.20%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.62%	1.72%	+10.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.45%	1.72%	+14.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.87%	1.72%	+16.15%

SPHQ vs. CPSU - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPHQ has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than CPSU's 0.69% expense ratio.

Dividends

SPHQ vs. CPSU - Dividend Comparison

SPHQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, while CPSU has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CPSU Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - June	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SPHQ Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF	1.04%	1.09%	1.15%	1.42%	1.85%	1.19%	1.55%	1.51%	1.85%	1.57%	1.67%	2.29%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SPHQ and CPSU in my portfolio?

SPHQ and CPSU have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SPHQ or CPSU?

On 1-year performance, SPHQ leads with 23.61% vs 6.60% for CPSU. On fees, SPHQ is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SPHQ or CPSU?

Over the 1-year period, SPHQ has performed better with a 23.61% return vs 6.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SPHQ or CPSU?

SPHQ is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for CPSU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SPHQ or CPSU?

SPHQ has the higher dividend yield at 1.04%, compared with 0.00% for CPSU.

What is the main difference between SPHQ and CPSU?

SPHQ is categorized as S&P 500, while CPSU is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Calamos. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SPHQ and 0.69% for CPSU.