SPHQ vs. CIVVX
SPHQ (Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF) and CIVVX (Causeway International Value Fund) are both funds - SPHQ is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Quality Index, while CIVVX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund managed by Causeway. Over the past 10 years, SPHQ returned 15.27%/yr vs 10.34%/yr for CIVVX. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SPHQ charges 0.15%/yr vs 1.10%/yr for CIVVX.
Performance
SPHQ vs. CIVVX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPHQ achieves a 16.79% return, which is significantly higher than CIVVX's 5.33% return. Over the past 10 years, SPHQ has outperformed CIVVX with an annualized return of 15.27%, while CIVVX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.34% annualized return.
SPHQ
- 1D
- 1.02%
- 1M
- 5.98%
- YTD
- 16.79%
- 6M
- 15.77%
- 1Y
- 24.32%
- 3Y*
- 22.40%
- 5Y*
- 14.55%
- 10Y*
- 15.27%
CIVVX
- 1D
- 2.85%
- 1M
- 2.77%
- YTD
- 5.33%
- 6M
- 7.90%
- 1Y
- 21.44%
- 3Y*
- 17.90%
- 5Y*
- 11.25%
- 10Y*
- 10.34%
SPHQ vs. CIVVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPHQ Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF | 16.79% | 13.25% | 25.44% | 24.83% | -15.76% | 28.03% | 17.36% | 33.64% | -7.10% | 19.10% |
CIVVX Causeway International Value Fund | 5.33% | 38.72% | 3.46% | 26.99% | -6.99% | 8.86% | 5.16% | 19.81% | -18.83% | 27.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPHQ and CIVVX is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2005 | 0.66 |
The correlation between SPHQ and CIVVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPHQ vs. CIVVX — Risk / Return Rank
SPHQ
CIVVX
SPHQ vs. CIVVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ) and Causeway International Value Fund (CIVVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPHQ | CIVVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.24 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.75 | 1.36 | +1.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.76 | 4.43 | +7.33 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPHQ vs. CIVVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPHQ drawdown since its inception was -57.83%, smaller than the maximum CIVVX drawdown of -61.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPHQ and CIVVX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPHQ | CIVVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.83% | -61.07% | +3.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.90% | -16.20% | +7.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.57% | -17.31% | +0.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.04% | -28.60% | +3.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.60% | -45.13% | +13.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -4.11% | +4.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.69% | -11.20% | +0.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.09% | 4.96% | -2.87% |
Volatility
SPHQ vs. CIVVX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ) is 4.92%, while Causeway International Value Fund (CIVVX) has a volatility of 5.92%. This indicates that SPHQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CIVVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPHQ | CIVVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.92% | 5.92% | -1.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.83% | 14.92% | -4.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.18% | 17.53% | -4.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.53% | 18.25% | -1.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.90% | 19.42% | -1.52% |
SPHQ vs. CIVVX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPHQ has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than CIVVX's 1.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPHQ vs. CIVVX - Dividend Comparison
SPHQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, less than CIVVX's 9.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIVVX Causeway International Value Fund | 9.11% | 9.59% | 9.07% | 3.39% | 1.54% | 1.60% | 1.11% | 4.41% | 3.31% | 1.73% | 1.69% | 1.70% |
SPHQ Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF | 1.03% | 1.09% | 1.15% | 1.42% | 1.85% | 1.19% | 1.55% | 1.51% | 1.85% | 1.57% | 1.67% | 2.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPHQ and CIVVX have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CIVVX has higher volatility (5.92%) compared to SPHQ (4.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPHQ dropped -57.83% vs CIVVX's -61.07%.
SPHQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPHQ and CIVVX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer